Literature DB >> 8804946

An unattended device for sleep-related breathing disorders: validation study in suspected obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

M Zucconi1, L Ferini-Strambi, V Castronovo, A Oldani, S Smirne.   

Abstract

Portable devices for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are considered to be an acceptable alternative to polysomnography (PSG), but their validation is essential. The aim of our study was to validate a device specifically designed for OSA diagnosis. Twenty nine suspected OSA patients were studied with simultaneous nocturnal PSG and an unattended recording device (MicroDigitrapper-S) (M-S). The device measured body position, snoring sound, oronasal flow, thoracic and abdominal effort, heart rate and percentage arterial oxygen saturation (Sa,O2%). We compared the apnoea plus hypopnoea index (AHI) and Sa,O2% results of PSG with that of the system's automatic analysis (M-SA). We also performed a semiautomatic analysis (M-SS) with visual editing of the raw data. Results at different AHI cut-off levels were analysed to obtain an indication of accuracy in diagnosis and severity. Both M-SA and M-SS showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% at the cut-off level of AHI > 10. When increasing the cut-off levels, M-SA sensitivity decreased (55% for AHI > 40), while specificity remained high (95%). This was improved to a clinically acceptable level of agreement by M-SS analysis (sensitivity 91% and specificity 94%). In conclusion, the MicroDigitrapper-S device showed a good sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of OSA. However, the device could not predict the severity of OSA precisely enough. In severe cases (apnoea plus hypopnoea index > 40), semi-automatic scoring was necessary to obtain a more accurate detection of the severity of the disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8804946     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.96.09061251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  5 in total

Review 1.  Wrist actigraphy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Martin; Alex D Hakim
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Misclassification of OSA severity with automated scoring of home sleep recordings.

Authors:  R Nisha Aurora; Rachel Swartz; Naresh M Punjabi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of sleep bruxism scoring in absence of audio-video recording: a pilot study.

Authors:  Maria Clotilde Carra; Nelly Huynh; Gilles J Lavigne
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  In-hospital testing for sleep-disordered breathing in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure: report of prevalence and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Rami N Khayat; David Jarjoura; Brian Patt; Todd Yamokoski; William T Abraham
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Toward standardizing the clinical testing protocols of point-of-care devices for obstructive sleep apnea diagnosis.

Authors:  Vivek Tangudu; Kahkashan Afrin; Sandy Reddy; Nicolaas E P Deutz; Steven Woltering; Satish T S Bukkapatnam
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.816

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.