Literature DB >> 8800386

Correlated responses to selection in FAST and SLOW mice: effects of ethanol on ataxia, temperature, sedation, and withdrawal.

E H Shen1, J D Dorow, M Huson, T J Phillips.   

Abstract

A replicated bidirectional selective breeding program has produced lines of mice that differ in locomotor response to ethanol (EtOH). FAST mice were bred for high locomotor activation, whereas SLOW mice were bred for low or depressed locomotor activity in response to 2.0 g/kg of EtOH. We tested FAST and SLOW mice for differences in sensitivity to the incoordinating (1.5 to 2.5 g/kg), hypothermic (3.0 g/kg), and sedative (4.0 g/kg) effects of EtOH, and for differences in sensitivity to withdrawal after acute and chronic EtOH exposure. SLOW mice were more ataxic in a grid test and developed greater tolerance than FAST mice at 2.0 g/kg of EtOH, were more hypothermic than FAST mice, and were more sensitive to the sedative effects of EtOH than FAST mice, as measured by latency to and duration of loss of righting reflex, and by blood ethanol concentrations at regain of the righting reflex. FAST mice had more severe withdrawal seizures after chronic exposure, but did not differ from SLOW mice in withdrawal severity after an acute injection of EtOH. These data suggest that FAST mice are generally more sensitive to central nervous system excitation, and SLOW mice are generally more sensitive to central nervous system sedation by EtOH, and further suggest genetic overlap with respect to genes that mediate locomotor responses to EtOH and genes determining sensitivity to EtOH-induced ataxia, hypothermia, sedation, and withdrawal severity after chronic exposure. Our current observations are in contrast to observations made earlier in selection, in which few line differences in sensitivity to EtOH effects other than locomotor activity were found. Thus, it seems that continued selection for differences in locomotor response to EtOH has produced genetically correlated differences in other EtOH responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8800386     DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1996.tb01673.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  10 in total

1.  Nicotine Enhances the Hypnotic and Hypothermic Effects of Alcohol in the Mouse.

Authors:  Cassandra A Slater; Asti Jackson; Pretal P Muldoon; Anton Dawson; Megan O'Brien; Lindsey G Soll; Rehab Abdullah; F Ivy Carroll; Andrew R Tapper; Michael F Miles; Matthew L Banks; Jill C Bettinger; Imad M Damaj
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Ethanol sensitivity in high drinking in the dark selectively bred mice.

Authors:  John C Crabbe; Lauren C Kruse; Alexandre M Colville; Andy J Cameron; Stephanie E Spence; Jason P Schlumbohm; Lawrence C Huang; Pamela Metten
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Naloxone does not attenuate the locomotor effects of ethanol in FAST, SLOW, or two heterogeneous stocks of mice.

Authors:  Sarah E Holstein; Raúl Pastor; Paul J Meyer; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Intracranial self-stimulation in FAST and SLOW mice: effects of alcohol and cocaine.

Authors:  Eric W Fish; J Elliott Robinson; Michael C Krouse; Clyde W Hodge; Cheryl Reed; Tamara J Phillips; C J Malanga
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse?

Authors:  Harriet de Wit; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Mapping quantitative trait loci mediating sensitivity to etomidate.

Authors:  Chris Downing; Elaine H Shen; Victoria J Simpson; Thomas E Johnson
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  GABAB receptor activation attenuates the stimulant but not mesolimbic dopamine response to ethanol in FAST mice.

Authors:  Sarah E Holstein; Na Li; Amy J Eshleman; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Attenuation of the stimulant response to ethanol is associated with enhanced ataxia for a GABA, but not a GABA, receptor agonist.

Authors:  Sarah E Holstein; Lauren Dobbs; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Combined scopolamine and ethanol treatment results in a locomotor stimulant response suggestive of synergism that is not blocked by dopamine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Angela C Scibelli; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Positive allosteric modulation of the GABA(B) receptor by GS39783 attenuates the locomotor stimulant actions of ethanol and potentiates the induction of locomotor sensitization.

Authors:  Lauren C Kruse; David N Linsenbardt; Stephen L Boehm
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 2.405

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.