Literature DB >> 8800101

Distinction between arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death after acute myocardial infarction based on heart rate variability, signal-averaged electrocardiogram, ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction.

J E Hartikainen1, M Malik, A Staunton, J Poloniecki, A J Camm.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether heart rate variability, the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG), ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction predict the mechanism of cardiac death after myocardial infarction.
BACKGROUND: Postinfarction risk stratification studies have almost exclusively focused on predicting the risk of arrhythmic death. The factors that identify and distinguish persons at risk for arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic death are poorly known.
METHODS: Heart rate variability, the signal-averaged ECG, ventricular arrhythmias and left ventricular ejection fraction were assessed in 575 survivors of acute myocardial infarction. The patients were followed up for 2 years; arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic cardiac deaths were used as clinical end points. During the follow-up period, 47 cardiac deaths occurred, 29 (62%) arrhythmic and 18 (38%) nonarrhythmic.
RESULTS: All risk factors were associated with cardiac mortality in univariate analysis. With the exception of left ventricular ejection fraction, they were also predictors of arrhythmic death. Depressed heart rate variability (p < 0.001), ventricular ectopic beats (p < 0.001) and low ejection fraction (p < 0.001) were related to nonarrhythmic death. In multivariate analysis, depressed heart rate variability (p < 0.001) and runs of ventricular tachycardia (p < 0.05) predicted arrhythmic death. Nonarrhythmic death was associated with depressed heart rate variability (p < 0.001), ventricular ectopic beats (p < 0.001) and low ejection fraction (p < 0.01). By selecting patients with depressed heart rate variability, long filtered QRS duration or ventricular arrhythmias and excluding patients with the lowest ejection fraction, we identified a group in which 75% of deaths were arrhythmic. Similarly, by selecting patients with a low ejection fraction and excluding patients with the lowest heart rate variability, we identified a group in which 75% of deaths were nonarrhythmic.
CONCLUSIONS: Arrhythmic death was associated predominantly with depressed heart rate variability and ventricular tachycardia runs, and nonarrhythmic death with low ejection fraction, ventricular ectopic beats and depressed heart rate variability. A combination of risk factors identified patient groups in which a majority of deaths were either arrhythmic or nonarrhythmic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8800101     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(96)00169-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  37 in total

1.  Stability over time of short-term heart rate variability.

Authors:  Tuula H Tarkiainen; Kirsi L Timonen; Pekka Tiittanen; Juha E K Hartikainen; Juha Pekkanen; Gerard Hoek; Angela Ibald-Mulli; Esko J Vanninen
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.435

2.  Depressed heart rate response to vasodilator stress for myocardial SPECT predicts mortality in patients after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Young Hwan Kim; Kyung-Han Lee; Hong Joo Chang; Eun Jeong Lee; Hyun Woo Chung; Joon Young Choi; Yong Choi; Yearn Seong Choe; Sang Hoon Lee; Byung-Tae Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Electrocardiographic evaluation in patients with systemic scleroderma and without clinically evident heart disease.

Authors:  Anna Biełous-Wilk; Małgorzata Poreba; Edyta Staniszewska-Marszałek; Rafał Poreba; Maciej Podgórski; Dariusz Kałka; Dariusz Jagielski; Lesław Rusiecki; Witold Pilecki; Eugeniusz Baran; Ryszard Andrzejak; Małgorzata Sobieszczańska
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 4.  [Ventricular tachycardia in postinfarction patients and coronary heart disease. Treatment and prognostic significance].

Authors:  Ingo Wickenbrock; Christian Perings
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2014-01-24

Review 5.  Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy or voodoo heart: analysis of heart/brain connections.

Authors:  Narges Moghimi; Samden D Lhatoo
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Heart rate variability in patients with the first and recurrent myocardial infarction.

Authors:  T Ristimäe; H V Huikuri; R Teesalu
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.435

7.  Electrocardiographic changes in workers occupationally exposed to lead.

Authors:  Rafał Poręba; Małgorzata Poręba; Paweł Gać; Aleksandra Steinmetz-Beck; Bogusław Beck; Witold Pilecki; Ryszard Andrzejak; Małgorzata Sobieszczańska
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  QRS duration: a simple marker for predicting cardiac mortality in ICD patients with heart failure.

Authors:  L Bode-Schnurbus; D Böcker; M Block; R Gradaus; A Heinecke; G Breithardt; M Borggrefe
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Surface Electrocardiogram Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Samy A Abdelghani; Todd M Rosenthal; Daniel P Morin
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

10.  Complex correlation measure: a novel descriptor for Poincaré plot.

Authors:  Chandan K Karmakar; Ahsan H Khandoker; Jayavardhana Gubbi; Marimuthu Palaniswami
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.