Samy A Abdelghani1, Todd M Rosenthal1, Daniel P Morin2. 1. Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. 2. Department of Cardiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA ; The University of Queensland School of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heart disease is a major cause of death in industrialized nations, with approximately 50% of these deaths attributable to sudden cardiac arrest. If patients at high risk for sudden cardiac arrest can be identified, their odds of surviving fatal arrhythmias can be significantly improved through prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement. This review summarizes the current knowledge pertaining to surface electrocardiogram (ECG) predictors of sudden cardiac arrest. METHODS: We conducted a literature review focused on methods of predicting sudden cardiac arrest through noninvasive electrocardiographic testing. RESULTS: Several electrocardiographic-based methods of risk stratification of sudden cardiac arrest have been studied, including QT prolongation, QRS duration, fragmented QRS complexes, early repolarization, Holter monitoring, heart rate variability, heart rate turbulence, signal-averaged ECG, T wave alternans, and T-peak to T-end. These ECG findings have shown variable effectiveness as screening tools. CONCLUSION: At this time, no individual ECG finding has been found to be able to adequately stratify patients with regard to risk for sudden cardiac arrest. However, one or more of these candidate surface ECG parameters may become useful components of future multifactorial risk stratification calculators.
BACKGROUND:Heart disease is a major cause of death in industrialized nations, with approximately 50% of these deaths attributable to sudden cardiac arrest. If patients at high risk for sudden cardiac arrest can be identified, their odds of surviving fatal arrhythmias can be significantly improved through prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement. This review summarizes the current knowledge pertaining to surface electrocardiogram (ECG) predictors of sudden cardiac arrest. METHODS: We conducted a literature review focused on methods of predicting sudden cardiac arrest through noninvasive electrocardiographic testing. RESULTS: Several electrocardiographic-based methods of risk stratification of sudden cardiac arrest have been studied, including QT prolongation, QRS duration, fragmented QRS complexes, early repolarization, Holter monitoring, heart rate variability, heart rate turbulence, signal-averaged ECG, T wave alternans, and T-peak to T-end. These ECG findings have shown variable effectiveness as screening tools. CONCLUSION: At this time, no individual ECG finding has been found to be able to adequately stratify patients with regard to risk for sudden cardiac arrest. However, one or more of these candidate surface ECG parameters may become useful components of future multifactorial risk stratification calculators.
Authors: Mitchell I Cohen; John K Triedman; Bryan C Cannon; Andrew M Davis; Fabrizio Drago; Jan Janousek; George J Klein; Ian H Law; Fred J Morady; Thomas Paul; James C Perry; Shubhayan Sanatani; Ronn E Tanel Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Matthew R Reynolds; David J Cohen; Aaron D Kugelmass; Phillip P Brown; Edmund R Becker; Steven D Culler; April W Simon Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Alfred E Buxton; Michael O Sweeney; Mark S Wathen; Mark E Josephson; Mary F Otterness; Elaine Hogan-Miller; Alice J Stark; Paul J Degroot Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Daniel P Morin; Eran S Zacks; Andreas C Mauer; Shaun Ageno; Matthew Janik; Steven M Markowitz; Suneet Mittal; Sei Iwai; Bindi K Shah; Bruce B Lerman; Kenneth M Stein Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Konstantinos P Letsas; Reinhold Weber; Klaus Astheimer; Dietrich Kalusche; Thomas Arentz Journal: Europace Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Otto Costantini; Stefan H Hohnloser; Malcolm M Kirk; Bruce B Lerman; James H Baker; Barathi Sethuraman; Mary M Dettmer; David S Rosenbaum Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sophie I Mavrogeni; Petros P Sfikakis; Theodoros Dimitroulas; Loukia Koutsogeorgopoulou; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; George Poulos; Genovefa Kolovou; George Theodorakis; George D Kitas Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Attila Frigy; Annamária Magdás; Victor-Dan Moga; Ioana Georgiana Coteț; Miklós Kozlovszky; László Szilágyi Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2017-04-03 Impact factor: 2.238
Authors: Basil M Saour; Jeffrey H Wang; Michael P Lavelle; Roy O Mathew; Mandeep S Sidhu; William E Boden; Joseph D Sacco; Eric J Costanzo; Mohammad A Hossain; Tuhsar Vachharanji; Anas Alrefaee; Arif Asif Journal: J Bras Nefrol Date: 2018-08-16
Authors: Issa Pour-Ghaz; Mark Heckle; Ikechukwu Ifedili; Sharif Kayali; Christopher Nance; Rajesh Kabra; Sunil K Jha; John L Jefferies; Yehoshua C Levine Journal: Curr Cardiol Rev Date: 2022
Authors: Gary Tse; Cheuk Wai Wong; Meng-Qi Gong; Lei Meng; Konstantinos P Letsas; Guang-Ping Li; Paula Whittaker; Aishwarya Bhardwaj; Abhishek C Sawant; William Kk Wu; Sunny Hei Wong; Jayaprakash Shenthar; Lap Ah Tse; Martin Cs Wong; Adrian Baranchuk; Gan-Xin Yan; Tong Liu Journal: J Geriatr Cardiol Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.327