Literature DB >> 8799087

Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening by faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer in Australia.

G Salkeld1, G Young, L Irwig, M Haas, P Glasziou.   

Abstract

The incremental costs and effects of annual faecal occult blood test screening in Australia were modelled for a hypothetical cohort of 1000 persons offered screening or not offered screening. Incremental costs and effects were estimated as the differences in direct health care costs (Australian costs) and years of life remaining between the annual-screen group and the control (no screen) group, based on the published results of the Minnesota randomised controlled trial. The cost per life year saved was $24,660. The greatest source of variability in the cost-effectiveness ratio is the effectiveness of screening. The 95 percent confidence interval for cumulative mortality in the annual-screen group is 3.86 to 7.9 per 1000, assuming the control rate is fixed at 8.83 per 1000. With this confidence interval, the cost per life year saved ranges from $12,695 to $67,848. The cost-effectiveness ratio increases to $48,000 if no mortality benefit is assumed beyond the end of the trial follow-up period, 13 years. The results are sensitive to the cost of colonoscopy (at $400 per colonoscopy, the cost per life year saved is $12,319) and the false-positive rate. The cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening is comparable with that of other screening programs but further evidence is needed on the efficacy of screening. Whether the benefits of colorectal cancer screening outweigh the harm and costs needs to be more certain before more resources are committed to mass screening. Health policy planners should initiate planning for Australian pilot projects in the event that the efficacy of screening is confirmed by two current studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8799087     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1996.tb01807.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  9 in total

Review 1.  The limited incorporation of economic analyses in clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Joel F Wallace; Scott R Weingarten; Chiun-Fang Chiou; James M Henning; Andriana A Hohlbauch; Margaret S Richards; Nicole S Herzog; Lior S Lewensztain; Joshua J Ofman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Cancer screening in renal transplant recipients: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Jeremy R Chapman; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Test performance of faecal occult blood testing for the detection of bowel cancer in people with chronic kidney disease (DETECT) protocol.

Authors:  Germaine Wong; Kirsten Howard; Jeremy R Chapman; Allison Tong; Michael J Bourke; Andrew Hayen; Petra Macaskill; Richard L Hope; Narelle Williams; Anh Kieu; Richard Allen; Steven Chadban; Carol Pollock; Angela Webster; Simon D Roger; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Prevention, screening and treatment of colorectal cancer: a global and regional generalized cost effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gary M Ginsberg; Stephen S Lim; Jeremy A Lauer; Benjamin P Johns; Cecilia R Sepulveda
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2010-03-17

5.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening - an overview.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.043

6.  Costs and cost-effectiveness of full implementation of a biennial faecal occult blood test screening program for bowel cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Michael P Pignone; Kathy L Flitcroft; Kirsten Howard; Lyndal J Trevena; Glenn P Salkeld; D James B St John
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 7.  Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Amy B Knudsen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

8.  Re-interpreting the data on the cost and effectiveness of population screening for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Nicholas Graves; Loretta McKinnon; Barbara Leggett; Beth Newman
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2005-05-18

9.  Improving Australian National Bowel Cancer Screening Program outcomes through increased participation and cost-effective investment.

Authors:  Joachim Worthington; Jie-Bin Lew; Eleonora Feletto; Carol A Holden; Daniel L Worthley; Caroline Miller; Karen Canfell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.