Literature DB >> 8798951

Spreadsheet evaluation of computerized medical records: the impact on quality, time, and money.

N Pliskin1, M Glezerman, I Modai, D Weiler.   

Abstract

Information and communication technologies are presumed to play a critical role in improving effectiveness and efficiency of clinical care. Although the most promising directions of technological development are microcomputer-generated computerized medical record systems, documenting their value has been a major challenge for health care providers. This paper proposes a 15-item spreadsheet instrument for evaluating computerized medical records, and demonstrates how it was experimentally applied to a 6-year long experience at three sites. In conclusion, preliminary implications and guidelines are drawn with regard to practice and research in this area.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798951     DOI: 10.1007/bf02260893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  29 in total

1.  The Regenstrief Medical Record System: 20 years of experience in hospitals, clinics, and neighborhood health centers.

Authors:  C J McDonald; W M Tierney; J M Overhage; D K Martin; G A Wilson
Journal:  MD Comput       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug

2.  Computerized medical records: defining a standard without the computer.

Authors:  A R Bradbury
Journal:  Med Inform (Lond)       Date:  1991 Jul-Sep

3.  Medical informatics and clinical decision making: the science and the pragmatics.

Authors:  E H Shortliffe
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Medicine and the computer. The promise and problems of change.

Authors:  W B Schwartz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1970-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Computer-stored medical records. Their future role in medical practice.

Authors:  C J McDonald; W M Tierney
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The introduction of computer-based patient records in The Netherlands.

Authors:  J van der Lei; J S Duisterhout; H P Westerhof; E van der Does; P V Cromme; W M Boon; J H van Bemmel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Physician use of a computerized medical record system during the patient encounter: a descriptive study.

Authors:  S S Warshawsky; J S Pliskin; J Urkin; N Cohen; A Sharon; M Binztok; C Z Margolis
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Modeling the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  N Pliskin; J S Alpert; J E Dalen; A A Sasahara
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1978-07

9.  Patient-interactive computer system for obtaining medication histories.

Authors:  J M DeLeo; F Pucino; K A Calis; K W Crawford; T Dorworth; J F Gallelli
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1993-11

10.  Medical information systems: assessing impact in the areas of hypertension, obesity and renal disease.

Authors:  J L Rogers; O M Haring; P M Wortman; R A Watson; J P Goetz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  2 in total

1.  Study of the cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical record systems in general hospital in China.

Authors:  Kai Li; Shinji Naganawa; Kai Wang; Ping Li; Ken Kato; Xiu Li; Jie Zhang; Kazunobu Yamauchi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Using electronic health records to save money.

Authors:  Yosefa Bar-Dayan; Halil Saed; Mona Boaz; Yehudith Misch; Talia Shahar; Ilan Husiascky; Oren Blumenfeld
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.