Literature DB >> 7078276

Medical information systems: assessing impact in the areas of hypertension, obesity and renal disease.

J L Rogers, O M Haring, P M Wortman, R A Watson, J P Goetz.   

Abstract

This study described the influence of a computerized medical record summary system in three disease areas (hypertension, obesity and renal disease) observed in the course of a controlled, randomized and prospective study of 479 Northwestern University Clinic patients. Experimental patients, who had available automated record summaries, and control patients, who had available only the manual record, were compared on several medical tests and procedures whose yearly occurrence was considered good medical practice for this patient population, and were compared as well as several measures of outcome of medical care. Evidence suggesting better care and outcome of care among patients with computerized record summaries available is presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7078276     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198201000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  18 in total

1.  Data quality and the electronic medical record: a role for direct parental data entry.

Authors:  S C Porter; K D Mandl
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

3.  Three decades of research on computer applications in health care: medical informatics support at the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Authors:  J Michael Fitzmaurice; Karen Adams; John M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Computer-generated patient education materials: do they affect professional practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Shaun P Treweek; Claire Glenton; Andrew D Oxman; Alister Penrose
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 6.  Implementing guidelines in general practice care.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1992-09

7.  Spreadsheet evaluation of computerized medical records: the impact on quality, time, and money.

Authors:  N Pliskin; M Glezerman; I Modai; D Weiler
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Intelligent Medical Record--entry (IMR-E).

Authors:  D Trace; F Naeymi-Rad; D Haines; J J Robert; F deSouza Almeida; L Carmony; M Evans
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  The efficiency of preoperative evaluation: a comparison of computerized and paper recording systems.

Authors:  K I Jackson; G L Gibby; J J van der Aa; A A Arroyo; J S Gravenstein
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-05

10.  A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  Philippa Davies; Anne E Walker; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.