Literature DB >> 8798375

Teaching effectiveness of the advanced trauma life support program as demonstrated by an objective structured clinical examination for practicing physicians.

J Ali1, R Cohen, R Adam, T J Gana, I Pierre, H Bedaysie, E Ali, U West, J Winn.   

Abstract

Although the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course is now taught internationally, its teaching effectiveness still requires confirmation. The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) reliably assesses clinical performance by utilizing standardized patients. An OSCE of eight 15 minute trauma patient stations and two 40 item MCQ tests were used to test the teaching effectiveness of the ATLS program in 32 practicing physicians who applied for an ATLS program in Trinidad and Tobago. The physicians were randomly assigned to an ATLS group (n = 16) that completed the ATLS course and a non-ATLS group (n = 16). Before and after the ATLS course, all physicians completed MCQ tests and trauma OSCE. Mean (+/- SD) OSCE scores (standardized to 20) ranged from 9.8 +/- 1.7 to 10.0 +/- 1.7 and 9.5 +/- 1.8 to 10.8 +/- 1.3 in the ATLS and non-ATLS groups, respectively, prior to the ATLS course (NS). Post-ATLS OSCE scores ranged from 15.9 +/- 1.7 to 17.6 +/- 1.7 in the ATLS group (p < 0.05 compared to pre-ATLS) and 9.5 +/- 1.4 to 10.1 +/- 1.3 in the non-ATLS group, which did not improve their OSCE scores. Adherence to priorities was graded 1 to 7 with the pre-ATLS grades of 1.7 +/- 0.6 (ATLS) and 1.8 +/- 0.7 (non-ATLS) and post-ATLS grades of 6.4 +/- 1.1 (ATLS) and 2.1 +/- 0.6 (non-ATLS). Organized approach to trauma was graded 1 to 5 with pre-ATLS grades of 1.6 +/- 0.5 (ATLS) and 1.7 +/- 0.6 (non-ATLS) and post-ATLS grades of 4.5 +/- 0.6 (ATLS) and 1.9 +/- 0.6 (non-ATLS). Pre-ATLS MCQ scores (%) were similar: 53.1 +/- 8.4 (ATLS) and 57.3 +/- 5.4 (non-ATLS), but post-ATLS scores were greater in the ATLS group: 85.8 +/- 7.1 (ATLS) and 64.2 +/- 3.6 (non-ATLS). Our data support the teaching effectiveness of the ATLS program among practicing physicians as measured by improvement in OSCE scores, adherence to trauma priorities, maintenance of an organized approach to trauma care, and cognitive performance in MCQ examinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798375     DOI: 10.1007/s002689900171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  10 in total

1.  [PHTLS team course: a pilot project. Structured student education in prehospital care of severely injured patients].

Authors:  C G Woelfl; T Guehring; A Moghaddam; B Gliwitzky; T Schaedler; P A Gruetzner; M Riess; C B Frank
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff.

Authors:  Sudha Jayaraman; Dinesh Sethi; Paul Chinnock; Roger Wong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-08-22

3.  Expertise of German paramedics concerning the prehospital treatment of patients with spinal trauma.

Authors:  M Kreinest; S Goller; B Gliwitzky; P A Grützner; M Küffer; D Häske; V Papathanassiou; M Münzberg
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Assessing intern core competencies with an objective structured clinical examination.

Authors:  Matthew W Short; Jennifer E Jorgensen; John A Edwards; Robert B Blankenship; Bernard J Roth
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

5.  The Trauma Evaluation and Management (TEAM) teaching module: its role for senior medical students in Canada.

Authors:  Jameel Ali
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Educational and clinical impact of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alshafi Mohammad; Frank Branicki; Fikri M Abu-Zidan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The comparison of the efficiency of traditional lectures to video-supported lectures within the training of the Emergency Medicine residents.

Authors:  Aydın Sarıhan; Neşe Colak Oray; Birdal Güllüpınar; Sedat Yanturali; Ridvan Atilla; Berna Musal
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-30

8.  A pilot multicentre cluster randomised trial to compare the effect of trauma life support training programmes on patient and provider outcomes.

Authors:  Martin Gerdin Wärnberg; Johanna Berg; Prashant Bhandarkar; Anirban Chatterjee; Shamita Chatterjee; Chintamani Chintamani; Li Felländer-Tsai; Anita Gadgil; Geeta Ghag; Marie Hasselberg; Catherine Juillard; Monty Khajanchi; Deepa Kizhakke Veetil; Vineet Kumar; Debabrata Kundu; Anurag Mishra; Priti Patil; Nobhojit Roy; Amit Roy; Siddarth David; Rajdeep Singh; Harris Solomon; Kapil Dev Soni; Lovisa Strömmer; Megha Tandon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  PHTLS ® (Prehospital Trauma Life Support) provider courses in Germany - who takes part and what do participants think about prehospital trauma care training?

Authors:  Christian B Frank; Christoph G Wölfl; Aidan Hogan; Arnold J Suda; Thorsten Gühring; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Matthias Münzberg
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2014-07-07

10.  Pay for performance - motivation to succeed in Advanced Trauma Life Support courses - a question of background or funding?

Authors:  Roman Klein; Wolfgang Armbruster; Martin Grotz; Bernd Höner; Matthias Münzberg; Paul Alfred Grützner; Christoph Georg Wölfl
Journal:  GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW       Date:  2017-12-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.