BACKGROUND: The training of medical school students at the University of Heidelberg seems to be improvable regarding prehospital trauma treatment compared to an established anaesthesiology-based training for medical emergencies. This study addresses the current situation and possibilities for advancing this training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A baseline was set by interviews of the medical school students. Based on this the hypothesis was postulated that there is a deficit in the education of the medical school students concerning the training in prehospital trauma treatment. This was proved by questionnaires given to the students in the 7th and 8th semesters at the University of Heidelberg Medical School. The results were evaluated and a possible approach for improvement was developed. RESULTS: A total of 111 questionnaires could be evaluated. It could be shown that the existing education was not effectual and that there is a need for a praxis-orientated 1-day course in prehospital trauma treatment. CONCLUSION: Especially the treatment of multiply injured patients is a challenge for young medical professionals. However, there is a high motivation to learn and train in emergency medicine. The students long for a practical trauma course compared to the advanced medical CPR course provided by the Department of Anaesthesiology of the University of Heidelberg. Those algorithm-based trauma courses do exist with PHTLS® and ATLS®. Based on these courses we developed the PHTLS® TEAM course.
BACKGROUND: The training of medical school students at the University of Heidelberg seems to be improvable regarding prehospital trauma treatment compared to an established anaesthesiology-based training for medical emergencies. This study addresses the current situation and possibilities for advancing this training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A baseline was set by interviews of the medical school students. Based on this the hypothesis was postulated that there is a deficit in the education of the medical school students concerning the training in prehospital trauma treatment. This was proved by questionnaires given to the students in the 7th and 8th semesters at the University of Heidelberg Medical School. The results were evaluated and a possible approach for improvement was developed. RESULTS: A total of 111 questionnaires could be evaluated. It could be shown that the existing education was not effectual and that there is a need for a praxis-orientated 1-day course in prehospital trauma treatment. CONCLUSION: Especially the treatment of multiply injured patients is a challenge for young medical professionals. However, there is a high motivation to learn and train in emergency medicine. The students long for a practical trauma course compared to the advanced medical CPR course provided by the Department of Anaesthesiology of the University of Heidelberg. Those algorithm-based trauma courses do exist with PHTLS® and ATLS®. Based on these courses we developed the PHTLS® TEAM course.
Authors: T Mittlmeier; F Bonnaire; P A Grützner; H Lill; G Matthes; A Prokop; J Seifert; C Voigt; F Walcher; C Wölfl; H Siebert Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: S Ruchholtz; B Zintl; D Nast-Kolb; C Waydhas; D Schwender; K J Pfeifer; L Schweiberer Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: M Kreinest; S Goller; G Rauch; B Gliwitzky; C Frank; S Matschke; C G Wölfl; M Münzberg Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 1.000
Authors: M Kreinest; S Goller; B Gliwitzky; P A Grützner; M Küffer; D Häske; V Papathanassiou; M Münzberg Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: David Häske; Stefan K Beckers; Marzellus Hofmann; Christoph G Wölfl; Bernhard Gliwitzky; Paul Grützner; Ulrich Stöckle; Matthias Münzberg Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2014-02-15 Impact factor: 2.463