Literature DB >> 8798046

A double-blind CT study comparing the safety and efficacy of iopentol and ioxaglate in paediatric patients.

N Sayegh1, C Porée, J Baraton, K Skinningsrud, C Nantois, D Lallemand.   

Abstract

Iopentol (Imagopaque); 300 mg I/ml was compared with ioxaglate (Hexabrix; 320 mg I/ml in 89 patients (45 and 44 patients, mean age 8.5 and 7.9 years in the contrast groups, respectively), in paediatric intravenous CT contrast enhancement. The dose injected was 2 ml/kg b.w. with an upper limit of 100 ml. There was a total of 18 patients who reported adverse events other than sensations of heat or cold, 6 (13%) in the iopentol group and 12 (27%) in the ioxaglate group. Two patients (4%) in the iopentol group reported possible contrast-related events as described above, whereas the number was 8 (18%) in the ioxaglate group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding adverse events, blood pressure, nor heart rate changes after injection. The overall quality of CT enhancement was excellent or sufficient in 96 and 93% of the cases in the iopentol and ioxaglate groups, respectively. Iopentol was shown to be a safe and effective contrast medium in examinations of children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798046     DOI: 10.1007/bf00182498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  12 in total

1.  Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.

Authors:  H Katayama; K Yamaguchi; T Kozuka; T Takashima; P Seez; K Matsuura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Chemotoxicity of contrast media and clinical adverse effects: a review.

Authors:  P Dawson
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  [Iohexol in excretory urography. Results of drug monitoring].

Authors:  K M Schrott; B Behrends; W Clauss; J Kaufmann; J Lehnert
Journal:  Fortschr Med       Date:  1986-02-20

4.  Image quality and safety in pediatric urography using an ionic and a non-ionic iodinated contrast agent.

Authors:  T Nybonde; H Wahlgren; O Brekke; D T Kristofferssen; W Mortensson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  1994

5.  Cardioangiography in children with iohexol, metrizoate and ioxaglate.

Authors:  M Kunnen; H Van Egmond; H Verhaaren; D Matthys; A Blancquaert
Journal:  Ann Radiol (Paris)       Date:  1985

6.  Safety of the nonionic contrast medium omnipaque in coronary angiography.

Authors:  K Levorstad; K Vatne; U Brodahl; B Laake; S Simonsen; T Aakhus
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Iopamidol in cardioangiography: a retrospective, multicentre study. Part II. Paediatric patients.

Authors:  L Ballerini; F Barbaresi; G Binaghi; C Cernigliaro; R Chioin; R Fattori; L Inglese; G Invernizzi; S Leto di Priolo; E Onorato
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

8.  Effect of iopentol on renal function and its use for calculation of glomerular filtration rate in children.

Authors:  G Stake; T Monclair; K J Berg; K Rootwelt; O Brekke
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 1.990

9.  Iodixanol and ioxaglate in cardioangiography: a double-blind randomized phase III study.

Authors:  P E Andersen; B Bolstad; K J Berg; P Justesen; P Thayssen; Y F Kloster
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  Myelography with iohexol (Omnipaque); a clinical report with special reference to the adverse effects.

Authors:  I O Skalpe; P Nakstad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.