Literature DB >> 8243006

Iodixanol and ioxaglate in cardioangiography: a double-blind randomized phase III study.

P E Andersen1, B Bolstad, K J Berg, P Justesen, P Thayssen, Y F Kloster.   

Abstract

A new non-ionic, dimeric contrast medium iodixanol (Nycomed AS, Norway) has a very low osmolality and is isotonic with blood. It has been compared with ioxaglate (Hexabrix, Laboratoire Guerbet, France) in a double-blind, randomized, parallel trial. The aims of the trial were to evaluate and compare the safety (vital signs, adverse events, discomfort and clinical-chemical parameters in blood and urine) and radiographic efficacy (diagnostic information and radiographic density) of iodixanol 320 mg I/ml vs ioxaglate (Hexabrix 320 mg I/ml) in coronary angiography and left ventriculography. Seventy-six patients referred for cardioangiography, two patients were withdrawn, 36 receiving iodixanol and 38 ioxaglate were included in the trial. Six patients (16%) in the iodixanol group and 16 (42%) patients in the ioxaglate group reported adverse events (P = 0.02). One serious adverse event occurred in the iodixanol group where a patient experienced transient cortical blindness and transitory global amnesia, but the patient recovered completely the day after the examination. Twenty-six patients reported injection-associated sensation of warmth in the iodixanol group versus 34 in the ioxaglate group (P = 0.06). Following contrast injection there were no differences between the groups regarding vital signs (ECG, heart rate, left ventricular pressures). Both contrast media were well tolerated by the kidneys, and on average only minor effects on clinical-chemical parameters in blood and urine were observed in the two groups. The radiographic efficacy was good in both groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8243006     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81016-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  Poul Erik Andersen's radiological work on Osteochondrodysplasias and interventional radiology.

Authors:  Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-08-28

Review 2.  Persistent neurological deficit from iodinated contrast encephalopathy following intracranial aneurysm coiling. A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  S Leong; N F Fanning
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Patient discomfort associated with the use of intra-arterial iodinated contrast media: a meta-analysis of comparative randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peter A McCullough; Patrizio Capasso
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.930

4.  Iodixanol vs iopamidol in intravenous DSA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity arteries: a comparative phase-III trial.

Authors:  R Fischbach; P Landwehr; K Lackner; J O Nossen; W Heindel; K J Berg; G Eichhorn; T F Jacobsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  A double-blind CT study comparing the safety and efficacy of iopentol and ioxaglate in paediatric patients.

Authors:  N Sayegh; C Porée; J Baraton; K Skinningsrud; C Nantois; D Lallemand
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.