Literature DB >> 8797521

Methods for summarizing the risk associations of quantitative variables in epidemiologic studies in a consistent form.

G Chêne1, S G Thompson.   

Abstract

A major problem in reviewing the published results of different epidemiologic studies of the relation between a quantitative variable and the risk of disease is that the results are presented in many different ways. The purpose of this paper is to exemplify methods by which results expressed either as risks (or rates) according to quantlle groups of the quantitative variable or as results derived from a logistic regression analysis can be reexpressed in a uniform manner, as a mean difference in the quantitative variable between the cases of disease and the other subjects in the study. An important assumption of the methods is that the quantitative variable has an approximately normal distribution, and a way of investigating the appropriateness of this assumption is given. The methods can be applied to both prospective and case-control studies and are exemplified by a number of studies of serum albumin concentrations and mortality. In some applications, these methods can be used as a precursor to formal meta-analysis, for example, when differential control of potential confounding factors is not a problem. At the least, the methods can be useful either in quantitatively reviewing published studies before undertaking new research or in putting the results of a new study into the context of previously published ones.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8797521     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  66 in total

1.  Food Groups and Risk of Overweight, Obesity, and Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Sabrina Schlesinger; Manuela Neuenschwander; Carolina Schwedhelm; Georg Hoffmann; Angela Bechthold; Heiner Boeing; Lukas Schwingshackl
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal variables in relation to the risk of testicular cancer--experiences of the son.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Olof Akre; David Forman; M Patricia Madigan; Lorenzo Richiardi; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  Circulating folate, vitamin B12, homocysteine, vitamin B12 transport proteins, and risk of prostate cancer: a case-control study, systematic review, and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Simon M Collin; Chris Metcalfe; Helga Refsum; Sarah J Lewis; Luisa Zuccolo; George Davey Smith; Lina Chen; Ross Harris; Michael Davis; Gemma Marsden; Carole Johnston; J Athene Lane; Marta Ebbing; Kaare Harald Bønaa; Ottar Nygård; Per Magne Ueland; Maria V Grau; John A Baron; Jenny L Donovan; David E Neal; Freddie C Hamdy; A David Smith; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Dietary lipids and endometrial cancer: the current epidemiologic evidence.

Authors:  Elisa V Bandera; Lawrence H Kushi; Dirk F Moore; Dina M Gifkins; Marjorie L McCullough
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of perinatal variables in relation to the risk of testicular cancer--experiences of the mother.

Authors:  Michael B Cook; Olof Akre; David Forman; M Patricia Madigan; Lorenzo Richiardi; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 6.  Association of serum total osteocalcin with type 2 diabetes and intermediate metabolic phenotypes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence.

Authors:  Setor Kwadzo Kunutsor; Tanefa Antoinette Apekey; Jari Antero Laukkanen
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  The plasma level of retinol, vitamins A, C and α-tocopherol could reduce breast cancer risk? A meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Authors:  Fulan Hu; Zhiwei Wu; Guangxiao Li; Chong Teng; Yupeng Liu; Fan Wang; Yashuang Zhao; Da Pang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 8.  Circulating insulin-like growth factor peptides and prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mari-Anne Rowlands; David Gunnell; Ross Harris; Lars J Vatten; Jeff M P Holly; Richard M Martin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Vitamin D and risk of future hypertension: meta-analysis of 283,537 participants.

Authors:  Setor Kwadzo Kunutsor; Tanefa Antoinette Apekey; Marinka Steur
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between body size and testicular cancer.

Authors:  C C Lerro; K A McGlynn; M B Cook
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.