Literature DB >> 8796198

Effects of tinted intraocular lens on contrast sensitivity.

K Niwa1, Y Yoshino, F Okuyama, T Tokoro.   

Abstract

We evaluated contrast sensitivity and glare in 64 pseudophakic eyes. An ultraviolet-absorbing intraocular lens (IOL) was implanted in 32 eyes and a noncyanopsia yellow-tinted IOL was implanted in 32 eyes. The latter lens was designed to effectively absorb light below a wave-length of 500 nm. Contrast sensitivity was measured at a pupil diameter of 3 mm using an artificial pupil. The implanted yellow-tinted IOL showed improved contrast sensitivity in the middle spatial frequencies of 6 and 12 c/deg in photopic and mesopic vision. In addition, the yellow-tinted IOL decreased the effect of central glare on the contrast sensitivity.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8796198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  14 in total

1.  How much blue light should an IOL transmit?

Authors:  M A Mainster; J R Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Measurements of transmission spectrums and estimation of retinal blue-light irradiance values of currently available clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Masaki Tanito; Tsutomu Okuno; Yoshihisa Ishiba; Akihiro Ohira
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Visual function in patients with yellow tinted intraocular lenses compared with vision in patients with non-tinted intraocular lenses.

Authors:  K Hayashi; H Hayashi
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Estimation of the melatonin suppression index through clear and yellow-tinted intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Ichiya Sano; Masaki Tanito; Tsutomu Okuno; Yoshihisa Ishiba; Akihiro Ohira
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Clinical comparative analysis of the outcomes with a yellow- and a violet-tinted intraocular lens.

Authors:  Peter Mojzis; Zdenek Bombera; Sarka Vesela; Daniela Klapuchova; Peter Ziak; David P Piñero
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Accelerated 20-year sunlight exposure simulation of a photochromic foldable intraocular lens in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Liliana Werner; Salwa Abdel-Aziz; Carolee Cutler Peck; Bryan Monson; Ladan Espandar; Brian Zaugg; Jack Stringham; Chris Wilcox; Nick Mamalis
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Role of short-wavelength filtering lenses in delaying myopia progression and amelioration of asthenopia in juveniles.

Authors:  Hai-Lan Zhao; Jin Jiang; Jie Yu; Hai-Ming Xu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 8.  Ultraviolet or blue-filtering intraocular lenses: what is the evidence?

Authors:  S M Downes
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  Recent studies provide an updated clinical perspective on blue light-filtering IOLs.

Authors:  James A Davison; Anil S Patel; Joao P Cunha; Jim Schwiegerling; Orkun Muftuoglu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Comparison of blue light-filtering IOLs and UV light-filtering IOLs for cataract surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-feng Zhu; Hai-dong Zou; Yong-fu Yu; Qian Sun; Nai-qing Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.