Literature DB >> 8794480

Accuracy of Monte Carlo photon transport simulation in characterizing brachytherapy dosimeter energy-response artefacts.

R K Das1, Z Li, H Perera, J F Williamson.   

Abstract

Practical dosimeters in brachytherapy, such as thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and diodes, are usually calibrated against low-energy megavoltage beams. To measure absolute dose rate near a brachytherapy source, it is necessary to establish the energy response of the detector relative to that of the calibration energy. The purpose of this paper is to assess the accuracy of Monte Carlo photon transport (MCPT) simulation in modelling the absolute detector response as a function of detector geometry and photon energy. We have exposed two different sizes of TLD-100 (LiF chips) and p-type silicon diode detectors to calibrated 60Co, HDR source (192Ir) and superficial x-ray beams. For the Scanditronix electron-field diode, the relative detector response, defined as the measured detector readings per measured unit of air kerma, varied from 38.46 V cGy-1 (40 kVp beam) to 6.22 V cGy-1 (60Co beam). Similarly for the large and small chips the same quantity varied from 2.08-3.02 nC cGy-1 and 0.171-0.244 nC cGy-1, respectively. Monte Carlo simulation was used to calculate the absorbed dose to the active volume of the detector per unit air kerma. If the Monte Carlo simulation is accurate, then the absolute detector response, which is defined as the measured detector reading per unit dose absorbed by the active detector volume, and is calculated by Monte Carlo simulation, should be a constant. For the diode, the absolute response is 5.86 +/- 0.15 (V cGy-1). For TLDs of size 3 x 3 x 1 mm3 the absolute response is 2.47 +/- 0.07 (nC cGy-1) and for TLDs of 1 x 1 x 1 mm3 it is 0.201 +/- 0.008 (nC cGy-1). From the above results we can conclude that the absolute response function of detectors (TLDs and diodes) is directly proportional to absorbed dose by the active volume of the detector and is independent of beam quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8794480     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/6/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  An extended analytical approach for diffuse optical imaging.

Authors:  H Erkol; F Nouizi; M B Unlu; G Gulsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  A concern on in-phantom photon energy response of luminescence dosimeters for clinical applications.

Authors:  A S Pradhan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-10

3.  Monte Carlo investigation of energy response of various detector materials in ¹²⁵I and ¹⁶⁹Yb brachytherapy dosimetry.

Authors:  T Palani Selvam; Biju Keshavkumar
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Absorbed dose and dose rate using the Varian OBI 1.3 and 1.4 CBCT system.

Authors:  Asa Palm; Elisabeth Nilsson; Lars Herrnsdorf
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction for solid-state detectors and phantom scatter correction at 137Cs energy.

Authors:  T Palani Selvam; Subhalaxmi Mishra; R S Vishwakarma
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.