Literature DB >> 8792508

Clinical utility of bone mass measurements in adults: consensus of an international panel. The Society for Clinical Densitometry.

P D Miller1, S L Bonnick, C J Rosen, R D Altman, L V Avioli, J Dequeker, D Felsenberg, H K Genant, C Gennari, K D Harper, A B Hodsman, M Kleerekoper, C A Mautalen, M R McClung, P J Meunier, D A Nelson, N F Peel, L G Raisz, R R Recker, W H Utian, R D Wasnich, N B Watts.   

Abstract

Low bone mass predicts future fracture risk as well as high cholesterol or high blood pressure can predict the risk of heart disease or stroke. Prevention of the first fracture should be a clinical goal. In patients without fractures, osteopenia and osteoporosis can be diagnosed based on the extent of reduction in bone mass below mean peak bone mass of young healthy individuals. As bone mass decreases, fracture risk increases exponentially. Clinical situations in which an assessment of bone mass and fracture risk affects therapeutic decisions include estrogen deficiency, vertebral abnormalities, radiographic osteopenia, asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism, and long-term corticosteroid therapy. Serial measurements can also be used to monitor the effects of osteoporosis treatments. The appropriate technique and skeletal site for bone mass measurements should be chosen based on the patient's circumstances and the precision of measurement. A clinical interpretation can enhance the value of computer-generated bone mass measurement reports and improve decision making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8792508     DOI: 10.1016/s0049-0172(96)80001-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis: reviews in endocrine and metabolic disorders.

Authors:  A T Shields; C H Chesnut
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Minimum sample size requirements for bone density precision assessment produce inconsistency in clinical monitoring.

Authors:  W D Leslie; A Moayyeri
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prevention of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis.

Authors:  J W Bijlsma
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 4.  Corticosteroid-Induced osteoporosis: detection and management.

Authors:  J D Adachi; A Papaioannou
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures.

Authors:  E E Hajcsar; G Hawker; E R Bogoch
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Qualitative and quantitative ultrashort-TE MRI of cortical bone.

Authors:  Jiang Du; Graeme M Bydder
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Raman Spectroscopic Analysis of Fingernail Clippings Can Help Differentiate Between Postmenopausal Women Who Have and Have Not Suffered a Fracture.

Authors:  James R Beattie; Niamh M Cummins; Clare Caraher; Olive M O'Driscoll; Aruna T Bansal; Richard Eastell; Stuart H Ralston; Michael D Stone; Gill Pearson; Mark R Towler
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-05-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.