C D Meade1. 1. H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe a systematic process to produce videotapes for cancer education and research. DATA SOURCES: Published research and education articles, patient and health education models, the National Cancer Institute's health communication model, and personal experiences. DATA SYNTHESIS: Videotapes provide a consistent form of teaching, are a familiar medium to most patients, and can communicate concepts in a realistic and visual manner. To enhance the acceptability, relevancy, and understanding of cancer messages, target-audience assessment and learner verification should be given special attention. Practical aspects of preproduction, production, and post-production phases, including budget considerations, script development, talent/narration, and location scouting, are important factors to address in producing videotapes. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer education videotapes can be developed through the use of a systematic process and by addressing practical aspects of video production. Assessment and inclusion of target audience members throughout the development process help to ensure that content meets learners' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses can produce effective educational videotapes by using a systematic framework to guide their efforts. Attention to practical aspects of production is necessary to create high-quality programs that are effective in terms of time, energy, and money.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To describe a systematic process to produce videotapes for cancer education and research. DATA SOURCES: Published research and education articles, patient and health education models, the National Cancer Institute's health communication model, and personal experiences. DATA SYNTHESIS: Videotapes provide a consistent form of teaching, are a familiar medium to most patients, and can communicate concepts in a realistic and visual manner. To enhance the acceptability, relevancy, and understanding of cancer messages, target-audience assessment and learner verification should be given special attention. Practical aspects of preproduction, production, and post-production phases, including budget considerations, script development, talent/narration, and location scouting, are important factors to address in producing videotapes. CONCLUSIONS:Cancer education videotapes can be developed through the use of a systematic process and by addressing practical aspects of video production. Assessment and inclusion of target audience members throughout the development process help to ensure that content meets learners' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses can produce effective educational videotapes by using a systematic framework to guide their efforts. Attention to practical aspects of production is necessary to create high-quality programs that are effective in terms of time, energy, and money.
Authors: Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Mira L Katz; Sarah Heaner; Paul Reiter; Julie van Putten; Lee Murray; Leon McDougle; Donald J Cegala; Douglas Post; Prabu David; Michael Slater; Electra D Paskett Journal: Am J Health Educ Date: 2009-07
Authors: Sung Hoon Kim; Won Uk Koh; Jin Ho Rhim; Myong Hwan Karm; Hye Suk Yu; Bo Yoeng Lee; Jin Woo Shin; Jeong Gill Leem Journal: Korean J Pain Date: 2012-10-04
Authors: Diana B Díaz; Thomas H Brandon; Steven K Sutton; Lauren R Meltzer; Hannah J Hoehn; Cathy D Meade; Paul B Jacobsen; Judith C McCaffrey; Eric B Haura; Hui-Yi Lin; Vani N Simmons Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Bernadette Stringer; Ted Haines; Charles H Goldsmith; Jennifer Blythe; Ramon Berguer; Joel Andersen; Christopher J De Gara Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Mohammed Jawad; Sam Ingram; Imran Choudhury; Anne Airebamen; Kostakis Christodoulou; Amanda Wilson Sharma Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 2.757