Literature DB >> 8792318

The interexaminer reliability of measuring passive cervical range of motion, revisited.

N Nilsson1, H W Christensen, J Hartvigsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the interexaminer reliability of measuring passive cervical range of motion (ROM).
DESIGN: Repeated blind measures of passive cervical ROM by two different examiners.
SETTING: Ambulatory outpatient facility in an independent National Health Service of Denmark funded chiropractic research institution. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five asymptomatic volunteers (17 men and 18 women) aged 20-28 yr. INTERVENTION: Measurement of passive cervical ROM with the use of a strap-on head goniometer by two blind examiners. Each subject was measured twice with 15-min intervals, using a mean-of-five-measurements protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The reliability of measuring passive cervical ROM in six separate directions of movement from "neutral zero" and from one extreme to the other in three planes.
RESULTS: The inter- and intra-examiner reliability was evaluated using a paired t test and Pearson's Correlation Coefficient (supplemented by a scatterplot). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were also calculated. Interexaminer reliability was found to be acceptable (Pearson's r = .61 - .88) for measuring in three planes. Interexaminer reliability was less than acceptable (Pearson's r = .39 - .70) for measuring passive ROM in 6 directions from neutral zero.
CONCLUSION: Passive cervical ROM could be measured reliably by different examiners for measurements in three planes. Measurements from neutral zero in six directions were unreliable when measured by different examiners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8792318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  3 in total

1.  Cervical range of movement in relation to neck dimension.

Authors:  Jeremy Reynolds; D Marsh; Heiko Koller; Juliane Zenenr; G Bannister
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reproducibility of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device for individuals with sub-acute whiplash associated disorders.

Authors:  Mark A Williams; Esther Williamson; Simon Gates; Matthew W Cooke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhone™ to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants.

Authors:  Yannick Tousignant-Laflamme; Nicolas Boutin; Alexandre M Dion; Carol-Anne Vallée
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.262

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.