Literature DB >> 8790611

An analysis of referral routes and diagnostic accuracy in cases of suspected glaucoma.

J H Sheldrick1, C Ng, D J Austin, A R Rosenthal.   

Abstract

Over a nine-month period two hundred and thirteen referrals to the Department of Ophthalmology of the Leicester Royal Infirmary, England, for suspicion of glaucoma were examined by a single ophthalmologist. Ninety-nine percent of referrals resulted from the findings at an optometric visit. Despite this, less than 32% were confirmed as having glaucoma and less than 23% had ocular hypertension. Twenty-nine percent showed no abnormality. Of those with glaucoma 19% showed advanced field loss in their worse eye. The guidelines relating to referral practices as a result of optometric examinations need to be reviewed and agreed upon by ophthalmologists, optometrists and general practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8790611     DOI: 10.3109/09286589409071443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol        ISSN: 0928-6586            Impact factor:   1.648


  10 in total

Review 1.  Should diabetic patients be screened for glaucoma? DARTS/MEMO Collaboration.

Authors:  J D Ellis; A D Morris; C J MacEwen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service.

Authors:  B Bowling; S D M Chen; J F Salmon
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  How can we improve the detection of glaucoma?

Authors:  R P Crick; M W Tuck
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-03-04

Review 4.  Screening for glaucoma. Why is the disease underdetected?

Authors:  M W Tuck; R P Crick
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Glaucoma.

Authors:  Rajiv Shah; Richard P L Wormald
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-09

6.  Visual field-based grading of disease severity in newly diagnosed primary open angle glaucoma patients presenting to a tertiary eye care centre in India.

Authors:  Sharmila Rajendrababu; Oshin Bansal; Sujani Shroff; Vijayalakshmi A Senthilkumar; Mohammed Sithiq Uduman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.031

7.  The willingness of patients presenting with advanced glaucoma to participate in a trial comparing primary medical vs primary surgical treatment.

Authors:  P Leighton; A J Lonsdale; J Tildsley; A J King
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Retrospective analysis of risk factors for late presentation of chronic glaucoma.

Authors:  S Fraser; C Bunce; R Wormald
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.

Authors:  Khalid Kamel; Edward Dervan; Kevin Falzon; Colm O'Brien
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Factors influencing accuracy of referral and the likelihood of false positive referral by optometrists in Bradford, United Kingdom.

Authors:  Christopher James Davey; Andrew J Scally; Clare Green; Edwin S Mitchell; David B Elliott
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-11-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.