Literature DB >> 8785662

Bayesian meta-analysis, with application to studies of ETS and lung cancer.

R L Tweedie1, D J Scott, B J Biggerstaff, K L Mengersen.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis enables researchers to combine the results of several studies to assess the information they provide as a whole. It has been used to give a systematic overview of many areas in which data on a possible association between an exposure and an outcome have been collected in a number of studies but where the overall picture remains obscure, both as to the existence or size of the effect. This paper outlines some innovations in meta-analysis, based on using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques for implementing Bayesian hierarchical models, and compares these with a more well-known random effects (RE) model. The new techniques allow different aspects of variation to be incorporated into descriptions of the association, and in particular enable researchers to better quantify differences between studies. Both the classical and Bayesian methods are applied, in this paper, to the current collection of studies of the association between incidence of lung cancer in female never-smokers and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), both in the home through spousal smoking and in the workplace. In this paper it is demonstrated that compared with the RE model, the Bayesian methods: (a) allow more detailed modeling of study heterogeneity to be incorporated; (b) are relatively robust against a wide choice of specifications of such information on heterogeneity; (c) allow for more detailed and satisfactory statements to be made, not only about the overall risk but about the individual studies, on the basis of the combined information. For the workplace exposure data set, the Bayesian methods give a somewhat lower overall estimate of relative risk of lung cancer associated with ETS, indicating the care that needs to be taken in using point estimates based on any one method of analysis. On the larger spousal data set the methods give similar answers. Some of the other concerns with meta-analysis are also considered. These include: consistency between different geographic areas (Asia and the United States), and our studies show that Bayesian methods permit an account of the overall picture to be taken, thus improving the ability to estimate accurately in the subgroups; and publication bias which, as shown with the spousal exposure data, may lead to an inflated excess risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8785662     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-5002(96)90222-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  8 in total

1.  A Bayesian mixture model for metaanalysis of microarray studies.

Authors:  Erin M Conlon
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  Reliability of league tables of in vitro fertilisation clinics: retrospective analysis of live birth rates.

Authors:  E C Marshall; D J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-06

Review 3.  Alternative approaches to endoscopic ablation for benign enlargement of the prostate: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Tania Lourenco; Robert Pickard; Luke Vale; Adrian Grant; Cynthia Fraser; Graeme MacLennan; James N'Dow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-06-30

4.  The choice of prior distribution for a covariance matrix in multivariate meta-analysis: a simulation study.

Authors:  Sandra M Hurtado Rúa; Madhu Mazumdar; Robert L Strawderman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimating the probability of IQ impairment from blood phenylalanine for phenylketonuria patients: a hierarchical meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christopher J Fonnesbeck; Melissa L McPheeters; Shanthi Krishnaswami; Mary Louise Lindegren; Tyler Reimschisel
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 4.982

6.  Quantifying, displaying and accounting for heterogeneity in the meta-analysis of RCTs using standard and generalised Q statistics.

Authors:  Jack Bowden; Jayne F Tierney; Andrew J Copas; Sarah Burdett
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review in Environmental Tobacco Smoke Risk of Female Lung Cancer by Research Type.

Authors:  Xue Ni; Ning Xu; Qiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Bayesian meta-analysis models for microarray data: a comparative study.

Authors:  Erin M Conlon; Joon J Song; Anna Liu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.