Literature DB >> 17879102

A Bayesian mixture model for metaanalysis of microarray studies.

Erin M Conlon1.   

Abstract

The increased availability of microarray data has been calling for statistical methods to integrate findings across studies. A common goal of microarray analysis is to determine differentially expressed genes between two conditions, such as treatment vs control. A recent Bayesian metaanalysis model used a prior distribution for the mean log-expression ratios that was a mixture of two normal distributions. This model centered the prior distribution of differential expression at zero, and separated genes into two groups only: expressed and nonexpressed. Here, we introduce a Bayesian three-component truncated normal mixture prior model that more flexibly assigns prior distributions to the differentially expressed genes and produces three groups of genes: up and downregulated, and nonexpressed. We found in simulations of two and five studies that the three-component model outperformed the two-component model using three comparison measures. When analyzing biological data of Bacillus subtilis, we found that the three-component model discovered more genes and omitted fewer genes for the same levels of posterior probability of differential expression than the two-component model, and discovered more genes for fixed thresholds of Bayesian false discovery. We assumed that the data sets were produced from the same microarray platform and were prescaled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879102     DOI: 10.1007/s10142-007-0058-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics        ISSN: 1438-793X            Impact factor:   3.410


  34 in total

1.  A comparison of oligonucleotide and cDNA-based microarray systems.

Authors:  Nancy Mah; Anders Thelin; Tim Lu; Susanna Nikolaus; Tanja Kühbacher; Yesim Gurbuz; Holger Eickhoff; Günther Klöppel; Hans Lehrach; Björn Mellgård; Christine M Costello; Stefan Schreiber
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2004-02-13       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  On parametric empirical Bayes methods for comparing multiple groups using replicated gene expression profiles.

Authors:  C M Kendziorski; M A Newton; H Lan; M N Gould
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: a case study in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Debashis Ghosh; Terrence R Barette; Dan Rhodes; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 3.410

4.  Meta-analysis of microarrays: interstudy validation of gene expression profiles reveals pathway dysregulation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Rhodes; Terrence R Barrette; Mark A Rubin; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Bayesian hierarchical model for identifying changes in gene expression from microarray experiments.

Authors:  Philippe Broët; Sylvia Richardson; François Radvanyi
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.479

6.  Are data from different gene expression microarray platforms comparable?

Authors:  Anna-Kaarina Järvinen; Sampsa Hautaniemi; Henrik Edgren; Petri Auvinen; Janna Saarela; Olli-P Kallioniemi; Outi Monni
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Jianhua Hu; Fei Zou; Fred A Wright
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Bayesian meta-analysis, with application to studies of ETS and lung cancer.

Authors:  R L Tweedie; D J Scott; B J Biggerstaff; K L Mengersen
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.705

9.  Cross-platform analysis of cancer microarray data improves gene expression based classification of phenotypes.

Authors:  Patrick Warnat; Roland Eils; Benedikt Brors
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Prognostic meta-signature of breast cancer developed by two-stage mixture modeling of microarray data.

Authors:  Ronglai Shen; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  6 in total

1.  Conceptual aspects of large meta-analyses with publicly available microarray data: a case study in oncology.

Authors:  Markus Schmidberger; Sabine Lennert; Ulrich Mansmann
Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights       Date:  2011-01-23

2.  On integrating multi-experiment microarray data.

Authors:  Georgia Tsiliki; Dimitrios Vlachakis; Sophia Kossida
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A Bayesian model for cross-study differential gene expression.

Authors:  Robert B Scharpf; Håkon Tjelmeland; Giovanni Parmigiani; Andrew B Nobel
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Genetic evidence and integration of various data sources for classifying uncertain variants into a single model.

Authors:  David E Goldgar; Douglas F Easton; Graham B Byrnes; Amanda B Spurdle; Edwin S Iversen; Marc S Greenblatt
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

5.  Consistent Differential Expression Pattern (CDEP) on microarray to identify genes related to metastatic behavior.

Authors:  Lam C Tsoi; Tingting Qin; Elizabeth H Slate; W Jim Zheng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Candidate pathways and genes for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of gene expression data.

Authors:  Ivan P Gorlov; Jinyoung Byun; Olga Y Gorlova; Ana M Aparicio; Eleni Efstathiou; Christopher J Logothetis
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.063

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.