Literature DB >> 8781872

Energy consumption of paraplegic locomotion using reciprocating gait orthosis.

J Beillot1, F Carré, G Le Claire, P Thoumie, B Perruoin-Verbe, A Cormerais, A Courtillon, E Tanguy, G Nadeau, P Rochcongar, J Dassonville.   

Abstract

The energy cost of walking using a reciprocating gait orthosis (RGOII) with functional electrical stimulation (FES) was assessed in 14 patients with spastic complete paraplegia from six rehabilitation centres. Before and after training asing RGOII with FES, the subjects performed a progressive maximal test on an arm-crank ergometer to obtain their laboratory peak oxygen uptake (LVO2peak), heart rate (HR) and blood lactate concentration changes. At the end of the training session, oxygen uptake (VO2) was measured during a walking test with orthosis at different speeds (6 min steady state at 0.1 m.s-1, followed by 2-min stages at progressively increasing speeds up to exhaustion). Of the subjects 4 repeated this test using orthosis without FES. At a speed of 0.1 m.s-1, VO2 represented 47 (SD 23)% of LVO2peak, mean HR was 137 (SD 21) beats.min-1 and mean blood lactate concentration 2.4. (SD 1.4) mmol.l-1. Maximal speed ranged from 0.23 to 0.5 m.s-1. At maximal speed, VO2 was 91 (SD 18)% of LVO2peak, mean HR reached 96 (SD 7)% and mean blood lactate concentration only 52 (SD 19)% of the maximal values measured during the laboratory test. Walking without electrical stimulation induced an increase in HR but there was no difference in VO2 and blood lactate compared to walking with stimulation. The training period did not result in any improvement in maximal physiological data. We concluded that the free cadence walking speed with orthosis remains much lower than that of able-bodied people or wheelchair users. The metabolic cost at a given speed is much higher even if, using a stimulation device, the cardiovascular stress is reduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8781872     DOI: 10.1007/bf02425502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  26 in total

1.  Ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  E Isakov; R Douglas; P Berns
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1992-04

Review 2.  Exercise and locomotion for the spinal cord injured.

Authors:  R M Glaser
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 6.230

3.  Physiologic costs of reciprocal gait in FES assisted walking.

Authors:  P Winchester; J J Carollo; R Habasevich
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1994-10

4.  Energy expenditure in patients with low-, mid-, or high-thoracic paraplegia using Scott-Craig knee-ankle-foot orthoses.

Authors:  K D Merkel; N E Miller; J L Merritt
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.616

5.  Aerobic performance capacity in paraplegic subjects.

Authors:  R Flandrois; M Grandmontagne; H Gerin; M H Mayet; J L Jehl; M Eyssette
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

6.  Restoration of gait with orthoses in thoracic paraplegia: a multicentric investigation.

Authors:  S Lotta; A Fiocchi; R Giovannini; R Silvestrin; L Tesio; A Raschi; L Macchia; V Chiapatti; M Zambelli; C Tosi
Journal:  Paraplegia       Date:  1994-09

7.  Physical strain in daily life of wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  T W Janssen; C A van Oers; L H van der Woude; A P Hollander
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 8.  Temperature regulation during upper body exercise: able-bodied and spinal cord injured.

Authors:  M N Sawka; W A Latzka; K B Pandolf
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Hydraulic resistance exercise benefits cardiovascular fitness of spinal cord injured.

Authors:  M M Cooney; J B Walker
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electric stimulation of the thigh muscles.

Authors:  S Hirokawa; M Grimm; T Le; M Solomonow; R V Baratta; H Shoji; R D D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  5 in total

1.  Control and implementation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals.

Authors:  Hugo A Quintero; Ryan J Farris; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot       Date:  2011

Review 2.  The efficiency of orthotic interventions on energy consumption in paraplegic patients: a literature review.

Authors:  M Arazpour; M Samadian; M Bahramizadeh; M Joghtaei; M Maleki; M Ahmadi Bani; S W Hutchins
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  A Powered Lower Limb Orthosis for Providing Legged Mobility in Paraplegic Individuals.

Authors:  Hugo A Quintero; Ryan J Farris; Clare Hartigan; Ismari Clesson; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2011-07-14

Review 4.  Functional walking ability of paraplegic patients: comparison of functional electrical stimulation versus mechanical orthoses.

Authors:  Mohammad Taghi Karimi
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-07-22

5.  Preliminary evaluation of a powered lower limb orthosis to aid walking in paraplegic individuals.

Authors:  Ryan J Farris; Hugo A Quintero; Michael Goldfarb
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.802

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.