Literature DB >> 8781862

Peak oxygen consumption and lactate threshold in full mask versus mouth mask conditions during incremental exercise.

C R Dooly1, A T Johnson, C O Dotson, P Vaccaro, P Soong.   

Abstract

Respirator masks vary in inhalation and exhalation resistance, and in dead volume. It is believed that these factors may contribute significantly to an early anaerobic threshold in mask wearers during maximal exercise. Very little is known concerning the effect of respirator masks on maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) and the lactate threshold (LT). The purpose of the present study was to assess peak VO2 (VO2peak), LT and the ventilatory threshold (VT) of 14 experienced cyclists performing two maximal cycle exercise protocols while wearing a full respirator mask (FM) (M17 type) and a mouth mask (MM). VO2peak was 10% lower under FM conditions. Peak values for ventilation (VEpeak), respiratory rate (fbpeak) and tidal volume (VTpeak) were all significantly lower under with FM versus MM conditions. Performance time and maximal heart rate (fcpeak) were not different between mask conditions. The LT and VT when expressed in %VO2peak, and the lactate concentration (mmol.l-1) at LT and VT were not significantly different across mask conditions. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated longer inhalation times, decreased Fr values and greater oxygen extraction under FM conditions. Thus, perhaps due to the increased inhalation resistance of the FM condition, subjects were unable to attain their "normal" VO2 despite similar performance times and maximal fc. Furthermore, despite a diminished VO2peak with FM, LT and VT appeared to be the same as with a MM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8781862     DOI: 10.1007/bf02425492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol        ISSN: 0301-5548


  15 in total

1.  Mask design considerations.

Authors:  A T Johnson; E G Cummings
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1975-03

2.  The physiological meaning of the maximal oxygen intake test.

Authors:  J H MITCHELL; B J SPROULE; C B CHAPMAN
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1958-04       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Respirator mask design modules and their interactions.

Authors:  A T Johnson; C M Grove
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1993-12

4.  Physiological effects of inspiratory resistance on progressive aerobic work.

Authors:  M Jetté; J Thoden; S Livingstone
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

5.  Respiratory and circulatory response to added air flow resistance during exercise.

Authors:  L Hermansen; Z Vokac; P Lereim
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  System to obtain exercise respiratory flow waveforms.

Authors:  A T Johnson; C R Dooly
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Effects of exercise using industrial respirators.

Authors:  P Harber; J Tamimie; J Emory; A Bhattacharya; M Barber
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1984-09

9.  A comparison of gas exchange indices used to detect the anaerobic threshold.

Authors:  V J Caiozzo; J A Davis; J F Ellis; J L Azus; R Vandagriff; C A Prietto; W C McMaster
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1982-11

10.  Respirator mask effects on exercise metabolic measures.

Authors:  A T Johnson; C R Dooly; C O Dotson
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1995-05
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Respirator masks protect health but impact performance: a review.

Authors:  Arthur T Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Eng       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 4.355

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.