Literature DB >> 878136

Keratoprosthesis: a 12-year follow-up.

L J Girard, R S Hawkins, R Nieves, T Borodofsky, C Grant.   

Abstract

A retrospective study of our total experience with implantation of four types of keratoprosthesis in 125 cases was reviewed. Diagnoses in the cases treated included chemical burns, derangement of the anterior segment from disease or injury, aphakic bullous keratopathy, ocular pemphigoid, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, anterior cleavage syndrome, Mooren ulcer, and blast injuries. The visual results in some cases have been gratifying and in others heartrending. Thirty percent of the patients attained 20/15 to 20/40 visual acuity, but at the end of 12 years, only 13% still had this visual acuity. Twenty-four percent attained 20/50 to 20/200 visual acuity, but this figure fell to 17% at the end of 12 years. Loss of initial good visual acuity was due to the numerous complications which required close observation and repeated surgery to control. The number of complications has been reduced by the use of a keratoprosthesis with a Dacron skirt and of the addition the Cardona nut and bolt to the shaft. The surgical technique has been improved by the use of a scleral expander, elimination of a scleral graft, and the use of the Tenon graft. The indications for the keratoprosthesis have changed over the years. Many alkali burns and practically all aphakic bullous keratopathy have been eliminated from the indications. Keratoprosthesis should be reserved for desperate cases. The technique of implantation is not complicated and initial results are usually good. The multiple complications, however, make it necessary for these cases to be followed by a surgeon who is familiar with the management of complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 878136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0161-6978


  7 in total

1.  Preparation and in vivo investigation of artificial cornea made of nano-hydroxyapatite/poly (vinyl alcohol) hydrogel composite.

Authors:  Xu Fenglan; Li Yubao; Yao Xiaoming; Liao Hongbing; Zhang Li
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  Development of hydrogel-based keratoprostheses: a materials perspective.

Authors:  David Myung; Pierre-Emile Duhamel; Jennifer R Cochran; Jaan Noolandi; Christopher N Ta; Curtis W Frank
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2008-04-19

3.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis for severe blinding vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Mooren's ulcer.

Authors:  Sayan Basu; Mukesh Taneja; Virender S Sangwan
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  The soft keratoprosthesis.

Authors:  D R Caldwell
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1997

5.  Keratoprosthesis: a long-term review.

Authors:  J J Barnham; M J Roper-Hall
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  A keratoprosthesis successfully implanted in the cornea of a rabbit, a SEM-study.

Authors:  W L Jongebloed; P van Andel; D Humalda; J G Worst
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01-15       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 7.  Histopathologic Evaluation of Polymer Supports for Pintucci-type Keratoprostheses: An Animal Study.

Authors:  Saeed Rahmani; Mozhgan Rezaei Kanavi; Mohammad Ali Javadi; Masoumeh Meskinfam Langroudi; Sasha Afsar Aski
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2019-07-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.