Literature DB >> 8773684

A dynamic analysis of changes in the nasolabial fold using magnetic resonance imaging: implications for facial rejuvenation and facial animation surgery.

A K Gosain1, M T Amarante, J S Hyde, N J Yousif.   

Abstract

An anatomic study was performed on living subjects using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to distinguish the relative contribution of skin, subcutaneous tissue, and muscle to dynamic changes in the nasolabial fold during facial animation and aging. MRI scans with the face in repose and then holding a full smile were performed in both young and old adult subjects. Anatomic landmarks were identified, and measurements characterizing their position were made on the MRI console. MRI resulted in excellent image resolution of facial tissue planes. Comparison between young and old subjects with the face in repose demonstrated that progressive thickening of the dependent portion of the check fat pad and overlying skin, with no appreciable change in the muscle plane comprising the levators of the upper lip, resulted in a deeper and more acute nasolabial fold in older subjects. In both age groups there was significant shortening of the mimetic muscles with smiling, with the lateral mimetic muscles drawn closer to the underlying facial bones. This was accompanied by redistribution of the cheek fat pad, thereby maintaining projection of surface landmarks within the cheek mass in young subjects with smiling. These findings indicate that in order to diminish the nasolabial fold, surgery for facial rejuvenation should be directed to the skin and subcutaneous tissue planes superficial to the mimetic muscles to the upper lip. In order to recreate a natural nasolabial fold during surgery for facial reanimation, contraction of the levator muscles to the upper lip should result in redistribution of the cheek fat pad without change in surface projection of the cheek mass or upper lip; this can only be accomplished if the reconstructed levator muscle is positioned deep to the cheek fat pad, with its insertion toward the deep (mucosal) surface of the upper lip.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8773684     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199609001-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  11 in total

1.  Gross anatomical, CT and MRI analyses of the buccal fat pad with special emphasis on volumetric variations.

Authors:  Marios Loukas; Theodoros Kapos; Robert G Louis; Christopher Wartman; Ashley Jones; Barry Hallner
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  An analysis of malar fat volume in two age groups: implications for craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Christina L Corey; Gerald R Popelka; Jose E Barrera; Sam P Most
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2012-10-22

3.  Deep brain stimulation in the internal capsule and nucleus accumbens region: responses observed during active and sham programming.

Authors:  Michael S Okun; Giselle Mann; Kelly D Foote; Nathan A Shapira; Dawn Bowers; Utaka Springer; William Knight; Pamela Martin; Wayne K Goodman
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  What's in a "smile?" Intra-operative observations of contralateral smiles induced by deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Michael S Okun; Dawn Bowers; Utaka Springer; Nathan A Shapira; Donald Malone; Ali R Rezai; Bart Nuttin; Kenneth M Heilman; Robert J Morecraft; Steven A Rasmussen; Benjamin D Greenberg; Kelly D Foote; Wayne K Goodman
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.881

5.  Autobiography of James S. Hyde.

Authors:  James S Hyde
Journal:  Appl Magn Reson       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 0.831

6.  Quantified Facial Soft-tissue Strain in Animation Measured by Real-time Dynamic 3-Dimensional Imaging.

Authors:  Vivian M Hsu; Ari M Wes; Youssef Tahiri; Joshua Cornman-Homonoff; Ivona Percec
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-10-07

7.  Aging and Sexual Differences of the Human Skull.

Authors:  Luiz Eduardo Toledo Avelar; Márcio Alberto Cardoso; Leonardo Santos Bordoni; Lorena de Miranda Avelar; João Victor de Miranda Avelar
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-04-27

8.  Why some women look young for their age.

Authors:  David A Gunn; Helle Rexbye; Christopher E M Griffiths; Peter G Murray; Amelia Fereday; Sharon D Catt; Cyrena C Tomlin; Barbara H Strongitharm; Dave I Perrett; Michael Catt; Andrew E Mayes; Andrew G Messenger; Martin R Green; Frans van der Ouderaa; James W Vaupel; Kaare Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The clinical importance of the fat compartments in midfacial aging.

Authors:  Dinah Wan; Bardia Amirlak; Rod Rohrich; Kathryn Davis
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-01-06

Review 10.  Injectable facial fillers: imaging features, complications, and diagnostic pitfalls at MRI and PET CT.

Authors:  Pravin Mundada; Romain Kohler; Sana Boudabbous; Laurence Toutous Trellu; Alexandra Platon; Minerva Becker
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2017-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.