Literature DB >> 24294406

An analysis of malar fat volume in two age groups: implications for craniofacial surgery.

Christina L Corey1, Gerald R Popelka, Jose E Barrera, Sam P Most.   

Abstract

Objective To evaluate how malar fat pad (MFP) volumes vary with age, after controlling for gender and body mass index (BMI). Study Design A prospective case-control study evaluating volume of the MFP in women of two age groups. Methods Soft tissue dimensions were measured in eight subjects using magnetic resonance imaging. A multiplanar localizing sequence, followed in sagittal and coronal orientations using a turbo spin echo sequence, was performed to define the MFP. Volumetric calculations were then performed using a 3D image analysis application (Dextroscope, Volume Interactions, Republic of Singapore) to circumscribe areas, orient dimensions, and calculate volumes of the MFP. Results These data reveal no significant difference in the mean (standard deviation) right MFP (p = 0.50), left MFP (p = 0.41), or total MFP (p = 0.45) volumes when comparing the two age groups. In addition, these data indicate that there was no correlation between age and total MFP volume (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.27). Moreover, there was no correlation between age and the ratio of total volume/BMI (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.18). Conclusions Although the sample size of this study was small, these data indicate that ptosis of midfacial fat is more important than volume loss in midfacial aging. These data would suggest repositioning as the primary modality for craniofacial reconstruction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fat; midface

Year:  2012        PMID: 24294406      PMCID: PMC3577599          DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  14 in total

1.  Anatomy and imaging of the deep fat of the face.

Authors:  J L Kahn; R Wolfram-Gabel; P Bourjat
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  The evolution of the midface lift in aesthetic plastic surgery.

Authors:  Malcolm D Paul; Jay W Calvert; Gregory R D Evans
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Facial implants: facial augmentation and volume restoration.

Authors:  Bruce B Chisholm
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the upper eyelid: correlation with the position of the skin crease in the upper eyelid.

Authors:  O Galatoire; V Touitou; F Heran; N Amar; P V Jacomet; L Gheck; R Berete-Coulibaly; S Benchekroun; S Morax
Journal:  Orbit       Date:  2007-09

5.  Gross anatomical, CT and MRI analyses of the buccal fat pad with special emphasis on volumetric variations.

Authors:  Marios Loukas; Theodoros Kapos; Robert G Louis; Christopher Wartman; Ashley Jones; Barry Hallner
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 6.  Volume loss versus gravity: new concepts in facial aging.

Authors:  Alexander S Donath; Robert A Glasgold; Mark J Glasgold
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Volumetric imaging of the malar fat pad and implications for facial plastic surgery.

Authors:  Jose E Barrera; Sam P Most
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

Review 8.  Current concepts in midfacial rejuvenation.

Authors:  Brian W Downs; Tom D Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Elevation of the malar fat pad with a percutaneous technique.

Authors:  Gregory S Keller; Ali Namazie; Keith Blackwell; Jeffrey Rawnsley; Sajjad Khan
Journal:  Arch Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging characterization of orbital changes with age and associated contributions to lower eyelid prominence.

Authors:  Sean J Darcy; Timothy A Miller; Robert A Goldberg; J Pablo Villablanca; Joseph L Demer; George H Rudkin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.