Literature DB >> 8773251

The interaction of visual and proprioceptive inputs in pointing to actual and remembered targets.

M B Berkinblit1, O I Fookson, B Smetanin, S V Adamovich, H Poizner.   

Abstract

Errors in pointing to actual and remembered targets presented in three-dimensional (3D) space in a dark room were studied under various conditions of visual feedback. During their movements, subjects either had no vision of their arms or of the target, vision of the target but not of their arms, vision of a light-emitting diode (LED) on their moving index fingertip but not of the target, or vision of an LED on their moving index fingertip and of the target. Errors depended critically upon feedback condition. 3D errors were largest for movements to remembered targets without visual feedback, diminished with vision of the moving fingertip, and diminished further with vision of the target and vision of the finger and the target. Moreover, the different conditions differentially influenced the radial distance, azimuth, and elevation errors, indicating that subjects control motion along all three axes relatively independently. The pattern of errors suggest that the neural systems that mediate processing of actual versus remembered targets may have different capacities for integrating visual and proprioceptive information in order to program spatially directed arm movements.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8773251     DOI: 10.1007/bf00230053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  8 in total

1.  Sensorimotor transformation during eye movements to remembered visual targets.

Authors:  J W Gnadt; R M Bracewell; R A Andersen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  J F Soechting; M Flanders
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand.

Authors:  C Prablanc; D Pélisson; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Further properties of the human saccadic system: eye movements and correction saccades with and without visual fixation points.

Authors:  W Becker; A F Fuchs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  On reaching.

Authors:  A P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 12.449

6.  Transformations between visual and kinesthetic coordinate systems in reaches to remembered object locations and orientations.

Authors:  W G Darling; G F Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Influence of movement speed on accuracy of pointing to memorized targets in 3D space.

Authors:  S Adamovich; M Berkinblit; B Smetanin; O Fookson; H Poizner
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1994-05-19       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12
  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position.

Authors:  M S Graziano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Influence of movement speed on accuracy and coordination of reaching movements to memorized targets in three-dimensional space in a deafferented subject.

Authors:  Julie Messier; Sergei Adamovich; Michail Berkinblit; Eugene Tunik; Howard Poizner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Target and hand position information in the online control of goal-directed arm movements.

Authors:  Fabrice Sarlegna; Jean Blouin; Jean-Pierre Bresciani; Christophe Bourdin; Jean-Louis Vercher; Gabriel M Gauthier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multiple frames of reference for pointing to a remembered target.

Authors:  Martin Lemay; George E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Yongqin Cui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The haptic reproduction of orientations in three-dimensional space.

Authors:  Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Eye-hand coordination in a sequential target contact task.

Authors:  Miles C Bowman; Roland S Johansson; Roland S Johannson; John Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects.

Authors:  Stefan Ladwig; Christine Sutter; Jochen Müsseler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Pointing control using a moving base of support.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Taegyong Kwon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.