Literature DB >> 8770608

Bayesian procedures for the estimation of mutation rates from fluctuation experiments.

G Asteris1, S Sarkar.   

Abstract

Bayesian procedures are developed for estimating mutation rates from fluctuation experiments. Three Bayesian point estimators are compared with four traditional ones using the results of 10,000 simulated experiments. The Bayesian estimators were found to be at least as efficient as the best of the previously known estimators. The best Bayesian estimator is one that uses (1/m2) as the prior probability density function and a quadratic loss function. The advantage of using these estimators is most pronounced when the number of fluctuation test tubes is small. Bayesian estimation allows the incorporation of prior knowledge about the estimated parameter, in which case the resulting estimators are the most efficient. It enables the straightforward construction of confidence intervals for the estimated parameter. The increase of efficiency with prior information and the narrowing of the confidence intervals with additional experimental results are investigated. The results of the simulations show that any potential inaccuracy of estimation arising from lumping together all cultures with more than n mutants (the jackpots) almost disappears at n = 70 (provided that the number of mutations in a culture is low). These methods are applied to a set of experimental data to illustrate their use.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8770608      PMCID: PMC1206960     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  13 in total

Review 1.  Haldane's solution of the Luria-Delbrück distribution.

Authors:  S Sarkar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On fluctuation analysis: a new, simple and efficient method for computing the expected number of mutants.

Authors:  S Sarkar; W T Ma; G H Sandri
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance.

Authors:  S E Luria; M Delbrück
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Fluctuation analysis: the effect of plating efficiency.

Authors:  F M Stewart
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Fluctuation analysis: the probability distribution of the number of mutants under different conditions.

Authors:  F M Stewart; D M Gordon; B R Levin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The origin of mutants.

Authors:  J Cairns; J Overbaugh; S Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Pitfalls and practice of Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis: a review.

Authors:  W S Kendal; P Frost
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Evaluation of methods for the estimation of mutation rates in cultured mammalian cell populations.

Authors:  I C Li; E H Chu
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 9.  Adaptive mutation: the uses of adversity.

Authors:  P L Foster
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 15.500

10.  Luria-Delbrück fluctuation experiments; accounting simultaneously for plating efficiency and differential growth rate.

Authors:  M E Jones
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1994-02-07       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Determining mutation rates in bacterial populations.

Authors:  W A Rosche; P L Foster
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.608

2.  A Bayesian two-level model for fluctuation assay.

Authors:  Qi Zheng
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Methods for determining spontaneous mutation rates.

Authors:  Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 4.  A practical guide to measuring mutation rates in antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Cassie F Pope; Denise M O'Sullivan; Timothy D McHugh; Stephen H Gillespie
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  A simple formula for obtaining markedly improved mutation rate estimates.

Authors:  Philip Gerrish
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Chromatin Modifiers Alter Recombination Between Divergent DNA Sequences.

Authors:  Ujani Chakraborty; Beata Mackenroth; David Shalloway; Eric Alani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Reversion From Methicillin Susceptibility to Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus During Treatment of Bacteremia.

Authors:  Megan K Proulx; Samantha G Palace; Sumanth Gandra; Brenda Torres; Susan Weir; Tracy Stiles; Richard T Ellison; Jon D Goguen
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  A reversible histone H3 acetylation cooperates with mismatch repair and replicative polymerases in maintaining genome stability.

Authors:  Lyudmila Y Kadyrova; Tony M Mertz; Yu Zhang; Matthew R Northam; Ziwei Sheng; Kirill S Lobachev; Polina V Shcherbakova; Farid A Kadyrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 5.917

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.