Literature DB >> 16793403

Methods for determining spontaneous mutation rates.

Patricia L Foster1.   

Abstract

Spontaneous mutations arise as a result of cellular processes that act upon or damage DNA. Accurate determination of spontaneous mutation rates can contribute to our understanding of these processes and the enzymatic pathways that deal with them. The methods that are used to calculate mutation rates are based on the model for the expansion of mutant clones originally described by Luria and Delbrück (1943) and extended by Lea and Coulson (1949). The accurate determination of mutation rates depends on understanding the strengths and limitations of these methods and how to optimize a fluctuation assay for a given method. This chapter describes the proper design of a fluctuation assay, several of the methods used to calculate mutation rates, and ways to evaluate the results statistically.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16793403      PMCID: PMC2041832          DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)09012-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  24 in total

1.  The application of a linear algebra to the analysis of mutation rates.

Authors:  M E Jones; S M Thomas; K Clarke
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1999-07-07       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Fluctuation analysis: the probability distribution of the number of mutants under different conditions.

Authors:  F M Stewart; D M Gordon; B R Levin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Spontaneous mutators in bacteria: insights into pathways of mutagenesis and repair.

Authors:  J H Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  Accounting for plating efficiency when estimating spontaneous mutation rates.

Authors:  M E Jones
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 5.  Counterselectable markers: untapped tools for bacterial genetics and pathogenesis.

Authors:  J M Reyrat; V Pelicic; B Gicquel; R Rappuoli
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Destabilization of simple repetitive DNA sequences by transcription in yeast.

Authors:  M Wierdl; C N Greene; A Datta; S Jinks-Robertson; T D Petes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  A modified Luria-Delbrück fluctuation assay for estimating and comparing mutation rates.

Authors:  G J Crane; S M Thomas; M E Jones
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1996-07-22       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  The origin of mutants.

Authors:  J Cairns; J Overbaugh; S Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Luria-Delbrück fluctuation experiments: design and analysis.

Authors:  M E Jones; S M Thomas; A Rogers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  138 in total

1.  A Bayesian two-level model for fluctuation assay.

Authors:  Qi Zheng
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  The SMC-like protein complex SbcCD enhances DNA polymerase IV-dependent spontaneous mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Kimberly A M Storvik; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Determinants of spontaneous mutation in the bacterium Escherichia coli as revealed by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Patricia L Foster; Heewook Lee; Ellen Popodi; Jesse P Townes; Haixu Tang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Preferential retrotransposition in aging yeast mother cells is correlated with increased genome instability.

Authors:  Melissa N Patterson; Alison E Scannapieco; Pak Ho Au; Savanna Dorsey; Catherine A Royer; Patrick H Maxwell
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2015-08-07

5.  Strand-biased cytosine deamination at the replication fork causes cytosine to thymine mutations in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ashok S Bhagwat; Weilong Hao; Jesse P Townes; Heewook Lee; Haixu Tang; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Identification of a prototypical single-stranded uracil DNA glycosylase from Listeria innocua.

Authors:  Jing Li; Ye Yang; Jose Guevara; Liangjiang Wang; Weiguo Cao
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-07-08

7.  Deciphering the Pathogenic Nature of Two de novo Sequence Variations in a Patient with Shprintzen-Goldberg Syndrome.

Authors:  Priyanka Srivastava; Shashank Shende; Kausik Mandal
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2021-05-06

8.  DnaN clamp zones provide a platform for spatiotemporal coupling of mismatch detection to DNA replication.

Authors:  Justin S Lenhart; Anushi Sharma; Manju M Hingorani; Lyle A Simmons
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.501

9.  Efficacy of ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin against Nocardia brasiliensis in vitro and in an experimental model of actinomycetoma in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Brenda Edith Chacon-Moreno; Oliverio Welsh; Norma Cavazos-Rocha; Maria de la Luz Salazar-Cavazos; Hector Gerardo Garza-Lozano; Salvador Said-Fernandez; Jorge Ocampo-Candiani; Lucio Vera-Cabrera
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  The Spectrum of Replication Errors in the Absence of Error Correction Assayed Across the Whole Genome of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Brittany A Niccum; Heewook Lee; Wazim MohammedIsmail; Haixu Tang; Patricia L Foster
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.