Literature DB >> 8770256

Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation.

F Z Yetkin1, T L McAuliffe, R Cox, V M Haughton.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the test-retest precision of functional MR maps of regions in the brain "activated" by sensory, motor, and cognitive tasks.
METHODS: Echo-planar images were acquired at 1.5 T in four subjects during voluntary motor activity involving the thumb and fingers and during tactile stimulation of the palm. Each subject performed the two tasks twice. Functional images of each task were generated at three thresholds. Test-retest precision was calculated in terms of two ratios: 1) the pixels activated in both iterations of the tasks in proportion to the pixels activated by either iteration of the task, and 2) the ratio modified to include first-order neighboring pixels. The first is referred to as pixel precision, and the latter as first-order-neighbor pixel precision.
RESULTS: In each subject, activation from the first and second iteration of each task was located in the same region of the same gyrus. Pixel precision was .57 for the two tasks (at a threshold of 0.50). First-order-neighbor precision was greater than .80 for the two tasks at the same threshold.
CONCLUSION: High test-retest precision can be obtained in functional MR.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8770256      PMCID: PMC8337954     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  34 in total

1.  Reproducibility of BOLD-based functional MRI obtained at 4 T.

Authors:  C Tegeler; S C Strother; J R Anderson; S G Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  FMRI of visual encoding: reproducibility of activation.

Authors:  W C Machielsen; S A Rombouts; F Barkhof; P Scheltens; M P Witter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Functional MRI at 1.5 tesla: a comparison of the blood oxygenation level-dependent signal and electrophysiology.

Authors:  E A Disbrow; D A Slutsky; T P Roberts; L A Krubitzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the primary motor cortex in humans: response to increased functional demands.

Authors:  S Khushu; S S Kumaran; R P Tripathi; A Gupta; P C Jain; V Jain
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Functional MR imaging activation after finger tapping has a shorter duration in the basal ganglia than in the sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  C H Moritz; M E Meyerand; D Cordes; V M Haughton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Reproducibility of the hemodynamic response to auditory oddball stimuli: a six-week test-retest study.

Authors:  Kent A Kiehl; Peter F Liddle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Multiple reproducibility indices for evaluation of cognitive functional MR imaging paradigms.

Authors:  Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti; Lance Driskill; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Reproducibility of functional MR imaging results using two different MR systems.

Authors:  Erik-Jan Vlieger; Cristina Lavini; Charles B Majoie; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Reproducibility of swallow-induced cortical BOLD positive and negative fMRI activity.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; B Douglas Ward; Shahryar Ahmad; Anna Patel; Andrew Nencka; Shi-Jiang Li; James Hyde; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.052

10.  Task-modulated coactivation of vergence neural substrates.

Authors:  Rajbir Jaswal; Suril Gohel; Bharat B Biswal; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.