Literature DB >> 8767137

[Biomechanics of the pubic symphysis. Which forces lead to mobility of the symphysis in physiological conditions?].

A Meissner1, M Fell, R Wilk, U Boenick, R Rahmanzadeh.   

Abstract

For estimation of the loads of fixation devices, physiological movements and acting forces at the symphysis pubis are examined. Experimentally, Walheim determined the movements of the pubic symphysis under physiological conditions (one-leg stance, walking): there is no effective mobility in the horizontal direction. During the one-leg stance he observed symphyseal mobility of up to 2.6 mm (Phi 1.2 mm) in the vertical direction and 1.3 mm (Phi 0.6 mm) in the sagittal direction. During walking he found symphyseal mobility of up to 2.2 mm (Phi 0.9 mm) in the vertical direction and 1.3 mm (Phi 0.6 mm) in the sagittal direction. Until now the forces leading to symphyseal mobility have not been estimated either experimentally or mathematically. In our experimental study we examined ten fresh cadaver anterior pelvic rings by means of a multidirectional force-mobility measurement. Maximal physiological movements, as determined by Walheim, were increasingly induced in ten equal steps, and the forces required were measured for every single step. Out of the resulting force-mobility curves for the ten cadaver specimens the mean force required (with standard deviation) was calculated for each of the ten measure points, separately for the vertical (y-) direction and sagittal (z-) direction. The values were graphically transferred, and a regression curve was created. This curve allows the acting force to be estimated for every movement of the pubic symphysis: During the one-leg stance the mean force to induce mean mobility is 169 N in vertical direction and 148 N in sagittal direction; for maximal mobility a force of 398 N in the vertical direction and 148 N in the sagittal direction is necessary. During walking, the force required to induce mean movement of the symphysis pubis is 120 N in the vertical direction and 68 N in the sagittal direction; for maximal mobility 333 N is required in the vertical direction and 136 N in the sagittal direction. For mobilization of patients with a symphyseal rupture (type Tile B 1) with partial weight-bearing, neutralization of the mean acting forces during the one-leg stance (169 N in the vertical direction, 68 N in the sagittal direction) must be achieved by an adequate fixation device. In cases where full weight bearing is desirable, such as in patients with limited compliance, stability can only be reached by neutralization of the maximal acting forces during walking (333 N in the vertical direction, 136 N in the sagittal direction).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8767137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  10 in total

1.  Symphyseal internal rod fixation versus standard plate fixation for open book pelvic ring injuries: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  G Osterhoff; S Tiziani; C Hafner; S J Ferguson; H-P Simmen; C M L Werner
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Authors' response to the letter to the editors by Professor M. T. Cibulka: a critical interpretation of sacroiliac joint movement studies.

Authors:  A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; B Sturesson; F H Willard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Anatomy of the sacroiliac joints.

Authors:  Michael T Cibulka
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  The adult human pubic symphysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ines Becker; Stephanie J Woodley; Mark D Stringer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Arthroscopic debridement of the pubic symphysis: an experimental study.

Authors:  Sascha Hopp; Ulf Culemann; Ishaq Ojodu; Tim Pohlemann; Jens Kelm
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Percutaneous fixation of traumatic pubic symphysis diastasis using a TightRope and external fixator versus using a cannulated screw.

Authors:  Yongzeng Feng; Jianjun Hong; Xiaoshan Guo; Chuangxin Lin; Wei Ling; Lifeng Zhang; Gang Wang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Fixation failure in patients with traumatic diastasis of pubic symphysis: impact of loss of reduction on early functional outcomes.

Authors:  Claudio Rojas; Ernesto Ewertz; Jose Miguel Hormazábal
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of seven fixation methods to treat pubic symphysis diastasis using finite element analysis.

Authors:  Yi-Quan Zheng; Li-Li Chen; Jia-Zuo Shen; Bing Gao; Xiao-Chuan Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Normal stress pattern of the pubic symphysis.

Authors:  Cigdem Icke; Juergen Koebke
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-03-13

10.  Novel minimally invasive tape suture osteosynthesis for instabilities of the pubic symphysis: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Adrian Cavalcanti Kußmaul; Fanny Schwaabe; Manuel Kistler; Clara Gennen; Sebastian Andreß; Christopher A Becker; Wolfgang Böcker; Axel Greiner
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.928

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.