Literature DB >> 8766454

Measuring social disabilities in mental health.

D Wiersma1.   

Abstract

Social functioning is important in relation to mental illness as it can limit the ability to function independently and because it may vary separately from symptoms. This paper summarises and critically reviews the development of the WHO Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. The value of social role theory is described followed by a classification of the relevant assessment scales in this field. Mental disorders are in general strongly associated with social dysfunctioning, particularly in schizophrenia and the major affective disorders. For a long time social dysfunctioning was considered an epiphenomenon and just a part of the disease process. Criteria for the diagnosis of a mental disorder were and still are often derived from the domains of work and social relationships. There are at least two related reasons why social functioning deserves a closer look: 1. There is an increasing trend to treat patients in the community instead of in the hospital: the changing orientation on community care needs careful evaluation with respect to its consequences. To what extent is survival in the community possible and what is the quality of life like there? Are community programs better than hospital treatment, and for whom? Therefore, separate measurement is justified for evaluation of outcome and costs and benefits. 2. There is growing evidence that the courses of symptomatology and social dysfunctioning may vary relatively independently: social disablement of a patient may be characterized much more by social disabilities than by persistent psychiatric symptoms; the former may call for another kind of action than usually available. For example, psychosocial rehabilitation focuses on cognitive and social abilities of the patient which are crucial for a more or less independent life. Therefore, separate measurement is justified for the sake of the right choice of treatment. The usual diagnostic systems such as the ICD and the DSM offer no adequate solution to the problem of classification and assessment of social dysfunctioning as a consequence of mental disorder. We have to look for other classification systems such as the International Classification Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps (ICIDH) of the WHO (1980, 1993) which offers a conceptual model to study the long-term consequences in terms of functional disabilities and experienced social handicaps, and the effectiveness of health care to handle these kind of problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8766454     DOI: 10.1007/bf00785755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol        ISSN: 0933-7954            Impact factor:   4.328


  22 in total

1.  The assessment of social adjustment. A review of techniques.

Authors:  M M Weissman
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1975-03

2.  The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.

Authors:  J Endicott; R L Spitzer; J L Fleiss; J Cohen
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1976-06

Review 3.  The measurement of 'social disablement'. The MRC social behaviour and social role performance schedules.

Authors:  J K Wing
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.328

4.  The Groningen Social Disabilities Schedule: development, relationship with I.C.I.D.H., and psychometric properties.

Authors:  D Wiersma; A DeJong; J Ormel
Journal:  Int J Rehabil Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 5.  An introduction to the concepts and classifications of the international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps.

Authors:  E M Badley
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.033

6.  Social adjustment as a criterion of treatment success: just what are we measuring?

Authors:  S Platt
Journal:  Psychiatry       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.458

7.  Ward rating scales for long-stay patients: a review.

Authors:  J N Hall
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  The relationship between social dysfunctioning and psychopathology among primary care attenders.

Authors:  T D Wohlfarth; W van den Brink; J Ormel; M W Koeter; A J Oldehinkel
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 9.319

9.  Assessment schedules for chronic psychiatric patients.

Authors:  E Sturt; T Wykes
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.723

10.  Psychological impairments and social disabilities: on the applicability of the ICIDH to psychiatry.

Authors:  D Wiersma
Journal:  Int Rehabil Med       Date:  1986
View more
  2 in total

1.  Reductions in stress and depressive symptoms in mothers of substance-exposed infants, participating in a psychosocial program.

Authors:  Janet K Kern; Emily Y West; Bruce D Grannemann; Tracy L Greer; Laura M Snell; Lori L Cline; Toosje T VanBeveren; Stephen F Heartwell; Beverly A Kleiber; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2004-09

Review 2.  Effect of psychosocial interventions on social functioning in depression and schizophrenia: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary J De Silva; Sara Cooper; Henry Lishi Li; Crick Lund; Vikram Patel
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 9.319

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.