Literature DB >> 8762716

A model for inhibitory lateral interaction effects in perceived contrast.

M W Cannon1, S C Fullenkamp.   

Abstract

The apparent contrast of a centrally viewed Gabor target patch was measured by contrast matching in the presence of Gabor flanking patches positioned on a ring of radius r from the center of the target patch. Central patch apparent contrast was determined as a function of the number of flanking patches, the radius r of the ring, and the contrasts of both central and flanking patches. The apparent contrast of the central patch was reduced by the presence of the flanking patches for all experimental conditions. A two layer non-linear model for contrast perception accounts quite well for the data. The first layer performs a power function transformation on the contrast signals from the patches. The second layer takes the outputs from the first layer and divides them by one plus the square root of spatially weighted responses of nearby first layer mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8762716     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00180-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  9 in total

1.  Contextual effects in fine spatial discriminations.

Authors:  Lynn A Olzak; Pentti I Laurinen
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Contextual effects on fine orientation discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Stephanie A Saylor; Lynn A Olzak
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Lateral effects in pattern vision.

Authors:  John M Foley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Anisotropy in spatial summation properties of human Ocular-Following Response (OFR).

Authors:  B M Sheliga; C Quaia; E J FitzGibbon; B G Cumming
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Ocular following in humans: spatial properties.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Boris M Sheliga; Edmond J Fitzgibbon; Lance M Optican
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Contrast sensitivity in natural scenes depends on edge as well as spatial frequency structure.

Authors:  Peter J Bex; Samuel G Solomon; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Variability in visual cortex size reflects tradeoff between local orientation sensitivity and global orientation modulation.

Authors:  Chen Song; Dietrich S Schwarzkopf; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Human Occipital and Parietal GABA Selectively Influence Visual Perception of Orientation and Size.

Authors:  Chen Song; Kristian Sandberg; Lau Møller Andersen; Jakob Udby Blicher; Geraint Rees
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Perception of global image contrast involves transparent spatial filtering and the integration and suppression of local contrasts (not RMS contrast).

Authors:  Tim S Meese; Daniel H Baker; Robert J Summers
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.