Literature DB >> 8756964

Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces.

H Hill1, V Bruce.   

Abstract

A series of experiments is reported that investigated the effects of variations in lighting and viewpoint on the recognition and matching of facial surfaces. In matching tasks, changing lighting reduced performance, as did changing view, but changing both did not further reduce performance. There were also differences between top and bottom lighting. Recognizing familiar surfaces and matching across changes in viewpoint were more accurate when lighting was from above than when it was from below the heads, and matching between different directions of top lighting was more accurate than between different directions of bottom lighting. Top lighting also benefited matching between views of unfamiliar objects (amoebae), though this benefit was not found for inverted faces. The results are difficult to explain if edge- or image-based representations mediate face processing and seem more consistent with an account in which lighting from above helps the derivation of 3-dimensional shape.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8756964     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.4.986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  28 in total

1.  Hierarchical processing of face viewpoint in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Vadim Axelrod; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding.

Authors:  Sharon Gilad; Ming Meng; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  F Christie; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

5.  Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected.

Authors:  Megan H Papesh; Stephen D Goldinger
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.

Authors:  Tessa R Flack; Richard J Harris; Andrew W Young; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Acoustic voice variation within and between speakers.

Authors:  Yoonjeong Lee; Patricia Keating; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effect of familiarity and viewpoint on face recognition in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Lisa A Parr; Erin Siebert; Jessica Taubert
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.490

9.  Perceiving parts and shapes from concave surfaces.

Authors:  Anthony D Cate; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Ensemble crowd perception: a viewpoint-invariant mechanism to represent average crowd identity.

Authors:  Allison Yamanashi Leib; Jason Fischer; Yang Liu; Sang Qiu; Lynn Robertson; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.