Literature DB >> 8753713

Periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum after total hip arthroplasty.

C A Peterson1, D G Lewallen.   

Abstract

Eleven patients who had sustained a periprosthetic fracture of the acetabulum at a mean of 6.2 years (range, one month to thirteen years) after a total hip arthroplasty were managed at our institution between 1985 and 1991. Five patients had a fracture of the medial wall; three, a fracture of the posterior column; two, a transverse fracture; and one, a fracture of the anterior column. Six fractures were displaced by two millimeters or more. Eight fractures were caused by blunt trauma or a fall, and three occurred spontaneously. A fracture was classified as type 1 if the acetabular component was clinically and radiographically stable (eight patients) and as type 2 if the component was unstable (three patients). One patient, who had a displaced type-2 fracture of the posterior column, died of an associated intrapelvic vascular injury. The other two patients who had a type-2 fracture were managed with revision of the acetabular component without supplemental plate fixation, immediately after the diagnosis of the fracture. The eight patients who had a type-1 fracture initially were managed with limitation of weight-bearing or modification of activity; in six of these patients, the fracture united without additional treatment. The ten surviving patients were followed for a mean of sixty-two months after the fracture. Eight of these patients-including four in whom a type-1 fracture had united after non-operative treatment-had a revision of the acetabular component because of pain, loosening, or non-union by the time of the most recent follow-up. Two patients (one of whom had a type-1 fracture and the other, a type-2 fracture) had multiple revisions of the acetabular component; both had supplemental internal fixation with a plate. All ten patients ultimately had a stable, functioning prosthesis. We conclude that periprosthetic acetabular fractures are associated with a poor prognosis with regard to the survival of the acetabular component but that it is possible to achieve union and to salvage a functional prosthesis in patients who have sustained such a fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8753713     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199608000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  26 in total

Review 1.  Treatment algorithm of acetabular periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Paul Simon; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Mario Formagnana; Marco Bargagliotti; Loris Perticarini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Complications of total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Amol Chitre; Henry Wynn Jones; Nikhil Shah; Anthony Clayson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

4.  [Osteosynthesis and cup revision in periprosthetic acetabulum fractures using a Kocher-Langenbeck approach].

Authors:  P Schwabe; S Märdian; C Perka; K-D Schaser
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 5.  [Importance of revision- and tumor-endoprosthetics in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the lower extremity].

Authors:  P M Prodinger; N Harrasser; C Suren; F Pohlig; H Mühlhofer; J Schauwecker; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Association of peptic ulcer disease and pulmonary disease with risk of periprosthetic fracture after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.794

7.  [Management of complications following resection and defect reconstruction of tumors near the hip joint].

Authors:  K-D Schaser; I Melcher; S Märdian; C Perka; R Locher; P Schwabe
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  [Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty : classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; P M Prodinger; M Hoberg; R Meffert; M Rudert; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Management of periprosthetic acetabular fractures in elderly patients--a minimally invasive approach.

Authors:  Ralph Zettl; Daphne Eschbach; Steffen Ruchholtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  [Periprosthetic fractures following total hip and knee arthroplasty: Risk factors, epidemiological aspects, diagnostics and classification systems].

Authors:  M Fuchs; C Perka; P von Roth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.