Literature DB >> 8752607

Complications of laparoscopy--operative and diagnostic.

B G Bateman1, L A Kolp, K Hoeger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the characteristics and rates of complications for operative laparoscopy and diagnostic laparoscopy.
DESIGN: Retrospective review.
SETTING: Tertiary-care university hospital. PATIENTS: Two thousand three hundred twenty-four patients undergoing operative laparoscopy or diagnostic laparoscopy.
INTERVENTIONS: Operative laparoscopy including lysis of adhesions, tubal surgery, ovarian surgery, uterine surgery, or destruction of endometriosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complication rates for operative and diagnostic laparoscopies were tabulated and compared.
RESULTS: The overall major complication rate for this series of 2,324 laparoscopies was 0.22%. There were five major and 15 minor complications. In the operative laparoscopy group, there were more complications from Veress needle and trocar insertion (n = 15) than from the actual operative procedures (n = 3). There were more total complications in the operative laparoscopy group (n = 18) than in the diagnostic laparoscopy group (n = 3).
CONCLUSION: Operative laparoscopy is efficacious for a variety of gynecologic surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8752607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  Direct visual or blind insertion of the primary trocar.

Authors:  S Jirecek; M Dräger; H Leitich; F Nagele; R Wenzl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Open pneumoperitoneum because of quality assurance.

Authors:  P B Millat
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Large bowel injuries during gynecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Kahraman Ulker; Turgut Anuk; Murat Bozkurt; Yetkin Karasu
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 4.  Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramifications.

Authors:  Rajesh Varma; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  High-pressure trocar insertion technique.

Authors:  H Reich; S C Ribeiro; C Rasmussen; J Rosenberg; A Vidali
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Laparoscopy in patients with prior surgery: results of the blind approach.

Authors:  F Lécuru; F Leonard; J Philippe Jais; E Rizk; F Robin; R Taurelle
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Conservative treatment of recognized laparoscopic colonic injury.

Authors:  M A Berry; M Rangraj
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  The direct trocar technique: an alternative approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopy.

Authors:  Mary T Jacobson; Joelle Osias; Ramin Bizhang; Mathew Tsang; Sneh Lata; Medad Helmy; Ceana Nezhat; Camran Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Laparoscopic control of a leaking inferior mesenteric vessel secondary to trocar injury.

Authors:  Mary T Jacobson; Scott Oesterling; Amin Milki; Camran Nezhat
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Complications of operative gynecological laparoscopy.

Authors:  Cristián S Miranda; Antonio R Carvajal
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.