Literature DB >> 8750026

The influence of target perturbation on manual aiming asymmetries in right-handers.

D Elliott1, J Lyons, R Chua, D Goodman, R G Carson.   

Abstract

Ten right-handed subjects performed 100 target-aiming movements with each hand. These movements were directed toward a small target on the midline. On 60% of the trials, the target remained stationary. On other randomly placed trials, the target "jumped" to a location 3 cm to the right (20%) or left (20%) of its original position when the cursor had travelled 6.5 cm. Although no hand differences were evident in the control condition, the right hand acquired the new target location more quickly than the left hand when the target was perturbed in either direction. Kinematic data revealed that this advantage was not due to initiating an adjustment to the initial movement more rapidly, but rather less time decelerating the corrective movement. Movement adjustments on perturbed trials were implemented more rapidly in left space than right space independent of the hand doing the aiming. These asymmetries may reflect the differential role of the two cerebral hemispheres in the control of goal-directed movements.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8750026     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80020-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  13 in total

1.  An investigation into manual asymmetries in grasp behavior and kinematics during an object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Flexibility in the control of rapid aiming actions.

Authors:  John J Buchanan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Kinematic and kinetic evidence for functional lateralization in a symmetrical motor task: the water polo eggbeater kick.

Authors:  Nuno Oliveira; Ross H Sanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Kathrin Wunsch; Robrecht van der Wel; Matthias Weigelt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Does hand dominance affect the use of motor abundance when reaching to uncertain targets?

Authors:  Sandra Maria Sbeghen Ferreira Freitas; John Peter Scholz
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Motor asymmetry in elite fencers.

Authors:  Selcuk Akpinar; Robert L Sainburg; Sadettin Kirazci; Andrzej Przybyla
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 1.328

7.  Avoiding moving obstacles.

Authors:  M Pilar Aivar; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sensorimotor performance asymmetries predict hand selection.

Authors:  A Przybyla; C J Coelho; S Akpinar; S Kirazci; R L Sainburg
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Rethinking motor lateralization: specialized but complementary mechanisms for motor control of each arm.

Authors:  Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Gambler's Fallacy: A Basic Inhibitory Process?

Authors:  James Lyons; Daniel J Weeks; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.