Literature DB >> 26070901

Frames of reference in action plan recall: influence of hand and handedness.

Christian Seegelke1,2, Charmayne M L Hughes3, Kathrin Wunsch4, Robrecht van der Wel5, Matthias Weigelt6.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that people are more likely to recall features of previous plans and use them for subsequent movements, rather than generating action plans from scratch for each movement. The information used for plan recall during object manipulation tasks is stored in extrinsic (object-centered) rather than intrinsic (body-centered) coordinates. The present study examined whether action plan recall processes are influenced by manual asymmetries. Right-handed (Experiment 1) and left-handed (Experiment 2) participants grasped a plunger from a home position using either the dominant or the non-dominant hand and placed it at one of the three target positions located at varying heights (home-to-target moves). Subsequently, they stepped sideways down from a podium (step-down podium), onto a podium (step-up podium), or without any podium present (no podium), before returning the plunger to the home platform using the same hand (target-back-to-home moves). The data show that, regardless of hand and handedness, participants grasped the plunger at similar heights during the home-to-target and target-back-to-home moves, even if they had to adopt quite different arm postures to do so. Thus, these findings indicate that the information used for plan recall processes in sequential object manipulation tasks is stored in extrinsic coordinates and in an effector-independent manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frame of reference; Grasping; Manual asymmetries; Motor planning; Posture

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26070901     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4350-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  57 in total

1.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual asymmetries in the preparation and control of goal-directed movements.

Authors:  P E Mieschke; D Elliott; W F Helsen; R G Carson; J A Coull
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Accommodation to increased accuracy demands by the right and left hands.

Authors:  J I Todor; J Cisneros
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 4.  On the other hand.

Authors:  Ira B Perelle; Lee Ehrman
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Measuring handedness with questionnaires.

Authors:  M P Bryden
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; C L MacKenzie; M Jeannerod; S Athenes; C Dugas
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1987-09

7.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence for abstract spatiotemporal forms in human motor control.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; Robin M Fleckenstein; Steven A Jax; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Bimanual grasp planning reflects changing rather than fixed constraint dominance.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Convergent models of handedness and brain lateralization.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

10.  Simulating my own or others action plans?--Motor representations, not visual representations are recalled in motor memory.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne Mary Lee Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.