Literature DB >> 8748793

Somatosensory evoked potential. Monitoring during spinal surgery.

M T Stechison1, S G Panagis, S S Reinhart.   

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) have been used to help minimize neurologic morbidity during spinal surgery. While this is a sensory test it has been used as an inference of motor function. The failure to always achieve the latter goal has resulted in some pessimism regarding the value of this test. In this series of 161 operations in 150 patients, it was demonstrated that SSEPs were recordable under anesthesia in 87% of patients. Of these patients, 12% had their spinal surgery interrupted due to significant neurophysiologic changes; of these patients, 18% had new neurologic deficits postoperatively. There were no cases with new neurologic deficits who had no changes in their SSEPs. It was concluded that SSEP monitoring may be helpful in identifying potentially neurologically threatening surgical maneuvers in a significant number of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8748793     DOI: 10.1007/bf02307415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  17 in total

1.  Dissociation of neurogenic motor and somatosensory evoked potentials. A case report.

Authors:  W D Mustain; R J Kendig
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Somatosensory cortical evoked potentials: a review of 100 cases of intraoperative spinal surgery monitoring.

Authors:  R W Keith; J L Stambough; S H Awender
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1990-09

3.  CEREBRAL RESPONSES TO ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF PERIPHERAL NERVE IN MAN.

Authors:  G D Dawson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1947-08       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory and neurogenic-motor evoked potentials in animals and humans.

Authors:  J H Owen; J Laschinger; K Bridwell; S Shimon; C Nielsen; J Dunlap; C Kain
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Response variability of somatosensory evoked potentials during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  D H York; R J Chabot; R W Gaines
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Recent applications of electrophysiologic monitoring during surgery.

Authors:  J R Daube
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl       Date:  1987

7.  Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia. A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential.

Authors:  B Ben-David; G Haller; P Taylor
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  R P Lesser; P Raudzens; H Lüders; M R Nuwer; W D Goldie; H H Morris; D S Dinner; G Klem; J F Hahn; A G Shetter
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 10.422

9.  Monitoring of cortical evoked potentials during surgical procedures on the cervical spine.

Authors:  M Veilleux; J R Daube; R F Cucchiara
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Lumbar radiculopathy after spinal fusion for scoliosis.

Authors:  C M Harper; J R Daube; W J Litchy; R A Klassen
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.217

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictive factors for neurological deterioration after surgical decompression for thoracic ossified yellow ligament.

Authors:  Chris Yuk Kwan Tang; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Ka Hei Leung; Yat Wa Wong; Keith Dip Kei Luk; Kenneth Man Chee Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Cavernous angiomas of the spinal district: surgical treatment of 11 patients.

Authors:  R Padovani; N Acciarri; M Giulioni; R Pantieri; M P Foschini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.