Literature DB >> 8744962

Competition and segmentation in spoken-word recognition.

D Norris1, J M McQueen, A Cutler.   

Abstract

Spoken utterances contain few reliable cues to word boundaries, but listeners nonetheless experience little difficulty identifying words in continuous speech. The authors present data and simulations that suggest that this ability is best accounted for by a model of spoken-word recognition combining competition between alternative lexical candidates, and sensitivity to prosodic structure. In a word-spotting experiment, stress pattern effects emerged most clearly when there were many competing lexical candidates for part of the input. Thus, competition between simultaneously active word candidates can modulate the size of prosodic effects, which suggests that spoken-word recognition must be sensitive both to prosodic structure and to the effects of competition. A version of the Shortlist model (D. G. Norris, 1994b) incorporating the Metrical Segmentation Strategy (A. Cutler & D. Norris, 1988) accurately simulates the results using a lexicon of more than 25,000 words.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8744962     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.21.5.1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  21 in total

1.  Lexical, syntactic, and stress-pattern cues for speech segmentation.

Authors:  L D Sanders; H J Neville
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Lexical access of resyllabified words: evidence from phoneme monitoring.

Authors:  J Vroomen; B de Gelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming.

Authors:  Dennis Norris; James M McQueen; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

Review 4.  [Speech perception. The basis for speech audiometry examinations].

Authors:  M Ptok; J Kiessling
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Lexical competition in phonological priming: assessing the role of phonological match and mismatch lengths between primes and targets.

Authors:  Sophie Dufour; Ronald Peereman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

6.  The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Liina Pylkkänen; Rodolfo Llinás; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Electrophysiological differentiation of phonological and semantic integration in word and sentence contexts.

Authors:  Michele T Diaz; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Lexical and metrical stress in word recognition: lexical or pre-lexical influences?

Authors:  Louisa M Slowiaczek; Emily G Soltano; Hilary L Bernstein
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-11

9.  Cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misperceptions and word spotting.

Authors:  J Vroomen; M van Zon; B de Gelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-11

10.  Training-induced pattern-specific phonetic adjustments by first and second language listeners.

Authors:  Angela Cooper; Ann Bradlow
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2018-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.