Literature DB >> 8742212

Pitfalls of patient education. Limited success of a program for back pain in primary care.

D C Cherkin1, R A Deyo, J H Street, M Hunt, W Barlow.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Low back pain patients seen in primary care were allocated randomly to one of two educational interventions or to usual care.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate educational interventions designed to improve the outcomes of primary care for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with back pain are frequently dissatisfied with their medical care and identify lack of information as the most insufficient aspect.
METHODS: In a large Health Maintenance Organization clinic, 293 subjects were allocated randomly to receive usual care, an educational booklet, or a 15-minute session with a clinic nurse, including the booklet and a follow-up telephone call. Outcome measures included satisfaction with care, perceived knowledge, participation in exercise, functional status, symptom relief, and health care use. Outcomes were assessed 1, 3, 7, and 52 weeks after the intervention.
RESULTS: The nurse intervention resulted in higher patient satisfaction than usual care (P < 0.001) and higher perceived knowledge (P < 0.001). Self-reported exercise participation was also higher in the nurse intervention group after a 1-week follow-up period (97% vs. 65% in the other groups; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences among the three groups in worry, symptoms, functional status, or health care use at any follow-up interval. Differences in self-reported exercise and perceived knowledge were no longer significant after 7 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings challenge the value of purely educational approaches in reducing functional impact or health care use related to back pain and also challenge the value of fitness exercise in the most acute phase of back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8742212     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199602010-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  31 in total

1.  Continuous quality improvement for patients with back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo; M Schall; D M Berwick; T Nolan; P Carver
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Back posture education in elementary schoolchildren: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Geldhof; Greet Cardon; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Should treatment of (sub)acute low back pain be aimed at psychosocial prognostic factors? Cluster randomised clinical trial in general practice.

Authors:  Petra Jellema; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Henriëtte E van der Horst; Jos W R Twisk; Wim A B Stalman; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-20

Review 4.  The placebo response: relationship to outcomes in trials of postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Gordon Irving
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Long-term effectiveness of a back education programme in elementary schoolchildren: an 8-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Mieke Dolphens; Barbara Cagnie; Lieven Danneels; Dirk De Clercq; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Greet Cardon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Whiplash associated disorders: a review of the literature to guide patient information and advice.

Authors:  T McClune; A K Burton; G Waddell
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Effectiveness of intervention for low back pain in female caregivers in nursing homes: a pilot trial based on multicenter randomization.

Authors:  Hiroharu Kamioka; Hiroyasu Okuizumi; Shinpei Okada; Ryosuke Takahashi; Shuichi Handa; Jun Kitayuguchi; Yoshiteru Mutoh
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 3.674

9.  Individualized chiropractic and integrative care for low back pain: the design of a randomized clinical trial using a mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Kristine K Westrom; Michele J Maiers; Roni L Evans; Gert Bronfort
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Exploring patient satisfaction: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of spinal manipulation, home exercise, and medication for acute and subacute neck pain.

Authors:  Brent D Leininger; Roni Evans; Gert Bronfort
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 1.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.