Literature DB >> 8741954

Reversal of overshadowing in a drug mixture discrimination in rats.

J A White1, I P Stolerman.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that in some circumstances, learning processes such as overshadowing may determine the effects that one drug has upon the response to another. The experiments described here examined overshadowing in rats trained to discriminate mixtures of nicotine plus midazolam in two-lever operant procedures with food reinforcement. After training for 60 sessions, midazolam (0.32 mg/kg SC) overshadowed nicotine (0.32 mg/kg SC) so that the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine seen in control rats trained with nicotine alone was abolished (n = 8-10). In the next phase of the study, the discriminative response to midazolam in one group of mixture-trained rats was devalued by means of an extinction procedure which weakened the relationship between administration of midazolam and the response that was reinforced. Dose-response determinations then showed that the devaluation procedure had indeed attenuated the response to midazolam, whereas the previously overshadowed response to nicotine was restored. Post-session injections of drugs were used to equate the pharmacological histories of the groups and the effects seen were therefore attributable to training with the drugs and not simply to repeated exposure to them. Additionally, in the control rats trained with nicotine only (with midazolam given post-session), midazolam markedly reduced response rates, whereas in the three groups of rats trained with the mixture, midazolam had little response rate-depressant effect; this observation suggests that behaviourally contingent tolerance had developed to the response rate-reducing effect of midazolam. Application of devaluation procedures in studies of the discriminative stimulus effects of single drugs with multiple effects may provide a means for manipulating the characteristics of the discriminations obtained and for identifying individual elements of the drug-produced stimulus complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8741954     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  18 in total

1.  In a low-versus high-dose drug discrimination task, random reinforcement in one drug state alters discriminative control only in that state.

Authors:  H.J. Rijnders; T.U.C. Järbe; J.L. Slangen
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Extinction and reacquisition of differential responding in rats trained to discriminate between chlordiazepoxide and saline.

Authors:  H J Rijnders; T U Järbe; J L Slangen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Theoretical and methodological considerations on drug discrimination learning.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1976-03-16

Review 4.  Drug discrimination studies.

Authors:  S G Holtzman
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Factors regulating drug cue sensitivity: limits of discriminability and the role of a progressively decreasing training dose in fentanyl-saline discrimination.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; C J Niemegeers; P A Janssen
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Discrimination of agonist-antagonist mixtures: experiments with nicotine plus mecamylamine.

Authors:  E.A. Mariathasan; I.P. Stolerman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Evidence for perceptual masking of the discriminative morphine stimulus.

Authors:  D V Gauvin; A M Young
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Dopaminergic and serotonergic mediation of the discriminable effects of ergot alkaloids.

Authors:  A M Holohean; F J White; J B Appel
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1982-07-30       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Role of training dose in discrimination of nicotine and related compounds by rats.

Authors:  I P Stolerman; H S Garcha; J A Pratt; R Kumar
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Analysis of the role of behavioural factors in the development of tolerance to the benzodiazepine midazolam.

Authors:  J W Griffiths; A J Goudie
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1987 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 5.250

View more
  5 in total

1.  Interoceptive conditioning in rats: effects of using a single training dose or a set of 5 different doses of nicotine.

Authors:  Steven T Pittenger; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Nicotine competes with a visual stimulus for control of conditioned responding.

Authors:  Jennifer E Murray; Nicole R Wells; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 3.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

4.  Nicotine vs. ethanol discrimination: extinction and spontaneous recovery of responding.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun

5.  Negative mood reverses devaluation of goal-directed drug-seeking favouring an incentive learning account of drug dependence.

Authors:  Lee Hogarth; Zhimin He; Henry W Chase; Andy J Wills; Joseph Troisi; Adam M Leventhal; Amanda R Mathew; Brian Hitsman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.