Literature DB >> 8739269

Diffusion MRI: precision, accuracy and flow effects.

T E Conturo1, R C McKinstry, J A Aronovitz, J J Neil.   

Abstract

After a decade of evolution and application of diffusion imaging, a large body of literature has been accumulated. It is in this context that the accuracy and precision of diffusion-weighted and quantitative diffusion MRI are reviewed. The emphasis of the review is on practical methods for clinical human imaging, particularly in the brain. The requirements for accuracy and precision are reviewed for various clinical and basic science applications. The methods of measuring and calculating diffusion effects with MRI are reviewed. The pulse gradient spin echo (PGSE) methods are emphasized as these methods are used most commonly in the clinical setting. Processing of PGSE data is reviewed. Various PGSE encoding schemes are also reviewed in terms of the accuracy and precision of isotropic and anisotropic diffusion measurements. The broad range of factors impacting the accuracy of the PGSE methods and other encoding schemes is then considered. Firstly, system inaccuracies such as background imaging gradients, gradient linearity, refocusing RF pulses, eddy currents, image misregistration, noise and dynamic range are considered. A second class of inaccuracies is contributed by the bulk effects of the imaged object, and include sample background gradients, subject motion of cerebrospinal fluid and organs, and aperiodic organ motion. A final category of potential inaccuracies is classified as being contributed by microscopic, biophysical tissue properties and include partial volume effects, anisotropy, restriction, diffusion distance, compartmentation, exchange, multiexponential diffusion decay, T2 weighting and microvascular perfusion. Finally, the application of diffusion methods to studies of blood flow in the microvasculature (i.e. the arterioles, capillaries and venules) are reviewed in detail, particularly in terms of feasibility and the stringent accuracy and precision requirements. Recent provocative studies examining the use of PGSE approaches to suppress microvascular signals in brain functional MRI (fMRI) are also reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8739269     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1940080706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  47 in total

1.  Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging with whole brain acquisition in a clinically acceptable time.

Authors:  Derek Kenton Jones; Steve Charles Rees Williams; David Gasston; Mark Andrew Horsfield; Andrew Simmons; Robert Howard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Characterization of imaging gradients in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Alpay Özcan
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  [Functional and molecular imaging of breast tumors].

Authors:  K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  A method for calibrating diffusion gradients in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Yu-Chien Wu; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Language dysfunction after stroke and damage to white matter tracts evaluated using diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  J I Breier; K M Hasan; W Zhang; D Men; A C Papanicolaou
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  A framework for quality control and parameter optimization in diffusion tensor imaging: theoretical analysis and validation.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars.

Authors:  Thierry A G M Huisman; Thomas Loenneker; Gerd Barta; Matthias E Bellemann; Juergen Hennig; Joachim E Fischer; Kamil A Il'yasov
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  High b-value diffusion tensor imaging of the neonatal brain at 3T.

Authors:  J Dudink; D J Larkman; O Kapellou; J P Boardman; J M Allsop; F M Cowan; J V Hajnal; A D Edwards; M A Rutherford; S J Counsell
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging and intellectual outcomes in spina bifida: laboratory investigation.

Authors:  Khader M Hasan; Ambika Sankar; Christopher Halphen; Larry A Kramer; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Maureen Dennis; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Theoretical and experimental analysis of imaging gradients in DTI.

Authors:  Alpay Ozcan
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.