Literature DB >> 8737906

Rewarding electrical brain stimulation: similar thresholds for Flinders Sensitive Line Hypercholinergic and Flinders Resistant Line Hypocholinergic rats.

K Matthews1, B A Baldo, A Markou, O Lown, D H Overstreet, G F Koob.   

Abstract

Flinders Sensitive Line hypercholinergic rats, which exhibit augmented hypothermic responses to the cholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine and to the muscarinic agonist oxotremorine, have been proposed to represent a useful animal model for some aspects of human depression. With disturbance of reward processes considered to be a core feature of depression, the present studies were designed to investigate the neuropharmacology of brain stimulation-reward (BSR) in Flinders Sensitive Line (FSL) rats, Flinders Resistant Line (FRL) rats, and outbred control Sprague-Dawley rats. All animals were tested in a rate-free, current-threshold brain stimulation-reward paradigm, following acute challenges with the monoamine reuptake inhibitor cocaine, the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH-23390, the cholinergic muscarinic antagonist scopolamine, and the serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. Baseline BSR thresholds did not differ across the three groups. For all groups, cocaine lowered thresholds, SCH-23390 and scopolamine-elevated thresholds, while fluoxetine had no significant effect. Thresholds for the three groups were not differentially affected by pharmacological locomotor activity relative to outbred Sprague-Dawley controls. These results suggest that both Flinders lines exhibit behavioral differences from outbred control rats, but not with regard to reward processes as assessed by rewarding electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8737906     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02212-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  9 in total

1.  Short- and long-term functional consequences of fluoxetine exposure during adolescence in male rats.

Authors:  Sergio D Iñiguez; Brandon L Warren; Carlos A Bolaños-Guzmán
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Intracranial self-stimulation in FAST and SLOW mice: effects of alcohol and cocaine.

Authors:  Eric W Fish; J Elliott Robinson; Michael C Krouse; Clyde W Hodge; Cheryl Reed; Tamara J Phillips; C J Malanga
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Role of serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors on brain stimulation reward and the reward-facilitating effect of cocaine.

Authors:  Vicky Katsidoni; Kalliopi Apazoglou; George Panagis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Novelty-seeking behavior predicts vulnerability in a rodent model of depression.

Authors:  Kristen A Stedenfeld; Sarah M Clinton; Ilan A Kerman; Huda Akil; Stanley J Watson; Alan F Sved
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-02-12

Review 5.  Treatment-resistant depression: are animal models of depression fit for purpose?

Authors:  Paul Willner; Catherine Belzung
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Assessing the motivational effects of ethanol in mice using a discrete-trial current-intensity intracranial self-stimulation procedure.

Authors:  Amanda M Barkley-Levenson; Andre Der-Avakian; Abraham A Palmer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  The reinforcement threshold and elasticity of demand for nicotine in an adolescent rat model of depression.

Authors:  John R Smethells; Danielle Burroughs; Amy Saykao; Paul R Pentel; Amir H Rezvani; Mark G LeSage
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Short- and long-term antidepressant effects of ketamine in a rat chronic unpredictable stress model.

Authors:  Yinghong Jiang; Yiqiang Wang; Xiaoran Sun; Bo Lian; Hongwei Sun; Gang Wang; Zhongde Du; Qi Li; Lin Sun
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 9.  Repurposing Cholinesterase Inhibitors as Antidepressants? Dose and Stress-Sensitivity May Be Critical to Opening Possibilities.

Authors:  Paul J Fitzgerald; Pho J Hale; Anjesh Ghimire; Brendon O Watson
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.558

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.