Literature DB >> 31864164

Assessing the motivational effects of ethanol in mice using a discrete-trial current-intensity intracranial self-stimulation procedure.

Amanda M Barkley-Levenson1, Andre Der-Avakian1, Abraham A Palmer2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alcohol (ethanol) produces both rewarding and aversive effects, and sensitivity to these effects is associated with risk for an alcohol use disorder (AUD). Measurement of these motivational effects in animal models is an important but challenging aspect of preclinical research into the neurobiology of AUD. Here, we evaluated whether a discrete-trial current-intensity intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) procedure can be used to assess both reward-enhancing and aversive responses to ethanol in mice.
METHODS: Male and female C57BL/6J mice were surgically implanted with bipolar stimulating electrodes targeting the medial forebrain bundle and trained on a discrete-trial current-intensity ICSS procedure. Mice were tested for changes in response thresholds after various doses of ethanol (0.5 g/kg-1.75 g/kg; n = 5-7 per dose), using a Latin square design.
RESULTS: A 1 g/kg dose of ethanol produced a significant reward-enhancement (i.e., lowered response thresholds), whereas a 1.75 g/kg dose produced an aversive effect (elevated response thresholds). Ethanol doses from 1 to 1.75 g/kg increased response latencies as compared to saline treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The discrete-trial current-intensity ICSS procedure is an effective assay for measuring both reward-enhancing responses to ethanol as well as aversive responses in the same animal. This should prove to be a useful tool for assessing the effects of experimental manipulations on the motivational effects of ethanol in mice.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aversion; Brain stimulation reward; Ethanol; Intracranial self-stimulation; Mice; Reward

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31864164      PMCID: PMC6939988          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  22 in total

1.  Construct validity of a self-stimulation threshold paradigm: effects of reward and performance manipulations.

Authors:  A Markou; G F Koob
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1992-01

Review 2.  Oral self-administration of ethanol and not experimenter-administered ethanol facilitates rewarding electrical brain stimulation.

Authors:  M Moolten; C Kornetsky
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.405

3.  Intracranial self-stimulation in FAST and SLOW mice: effects of alcohol and cocaine.

Authors:  Eric W Fish; J Elliott Robinson; Michael C Krouse; Clyde W Hodge; Cheryl Reed; Tamara J Phillips; C J Malanga
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Animal Models of Addiction and Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Their Role in Drug Discovery: Honoring the Legacy of Athina Markou.

Authors:  Paul J Kenny; Daniel Hoyer; George F Koob
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Synergistic effects of ethanol and cocaine on brain stimulation reward.

Authors:  M J Lewis; H L June
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Euphorigenic drugs: effects on the reward pathways of the brain.

Authors:  C Kornetsky; R U Esposito
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1979-10

7.  Affective and somatic aspects of spontaneous and precipitated nicotine withdrawal in C57BL/6J and BALB/cByJ mice.

Authors:  Astrid K Stoker; Svetlana Semenova; Athina Markou
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 5.250

8.  The effects of cocaine on the rate independent brain stimulation reward threshold in the mouse.

Authors:  Brian M Gill; Clifford M Knapp; Conan Kornetsky
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Diazepam and cocaine potentiate brain stimulation reward in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Carolin J Straub; William A Carlezon; Uwe Rudolph
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Rewarding electrical brain stimulation: similar thresholds for Flinders Sensitive Line Hypercholinergic and Flinders Resistant Line Hypocholinergic rats.

Authors:  K Matthews; B A Baldo; A Markou; O Lown; D H Overstreet; G F Koob
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1996-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.