Literature DB >> 8734793

Ankle arthrodesis: results after the miniarthrotomy technique.

G D Paremain1, S D Miller, M S Myerson.   

Abstract

Of 34 ankle fusions (34 patients) performed at our institution between June 1992 and June 1993, 15 utilized a miniarthrotomy technique. This technique involves two 1.5-cm incisions, one medial and one anterolateral, through which the ankle joint cartilage and synovium are debrided. Subchondral bone resection is completed with a high-speed cutting tool, creating a "slurry" that is saved for local bone graft. The ankle is then appropriately positioned (5 degrees of valgus, 0 degree of dorsiflexion, and neutral rotation), cannulated screws are inserted, the position is checked fluoroscopically, and the wound is closed. The patient receives a short leg cast at 2 weeks and a walking cast at 3 to 5 weeks until there is radiographic and clinical evidence of solid arthrodesis. In our 15 patients, follow-up ranged from 12 to 19 months after surgery and arthrodesis was radiographically evident at a mean of 6.0 weeks (range, 3-15 weeks). Complications were limited to a transient synovitis in 7/15 patients, which lasted approximately 3 weeks and was possibly related to the bone slurry. Although ankle joints with marked malalignment require a more extensive open arthrodesis procedure, this miniarthrotomy technique offers decreased soft-tissue insult, decreased bone stripping, easy application, and rapid healing time for the treatment of severe degenerative changes of the ankle with minimal deformity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8734793     DOI: 10.1177/107110079601700502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Arthrodesis and endoprostheses of the ankle joint: indications, techniques and pitfalls].

Authors:  S H Wirth; G Klammer; N Espinosa
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Management of Posttraumatic Ankle Arthritis: Literature Review.

Authors:  Samuel O Ewalefo; Malcolm Dombrowski; Takashi Hirase; Jorge L Rocha; Mitchell Weaver; Alex Kline; Dwayne Carney; MaCalus V Hogan
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-12

3.  A New Classification for Ankle Arthrodesis When Using an External Fixator.

Authors:  Hidenori Matsubara; Koji Watanabe; Munetomo Takata; Issei Nomura; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2019 Sep-Dec

4.  Treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: arthrodesis versus total ankle replacement.

Authors:  N Espinosa; G Klammer
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Mini-open vs. Transfibular Approach for Ankle Arthrodesis, Which Approach is Superior in Joint Preparation: A Cadaver Study.

Authors:  Karthikeyan Chinnakkannu; Haley M McKissack; Jun Kit He; Bradley Alexander; John Wilson; Gean C Viner; Ashish Shah
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 6.  Ankle Arthritis.

Authors:  Vu Le; Andrea Veljkovic; Peter Salat; Kevin Wing; Murray Penner; Alastair Younger
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2019-07-19

7.  Combined Transfibular and Anterior Approaches Increase Union Rate and Decrease Non-Weight-Bearing Periods in Ankle Arthrodesis: Combined Approaches in Ankle Arthrodesis.

Authors:  Jeong-Jin Park; Whee-Sung Son; In-Ha Woo; Chul-Hyun Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.