Literature DB >> 8734050

Motion sensitive cells in the macaque superior temporal polysensory area: response discrimination between self-generated and externally generated pattern motion.

J K Hietanen1, D I Perrett.   

Abstract

It was previously shown [17] that visual movement sensitive neurons lacking selectivity in the anterior parts of the dorsal superior temporal sulcus (STP) of monkeys exhibited selective responses to externally moved objects and failed to respond to the sight of the animal's own limb movements. This paper describes a series of experiments in which a monkey was trained to operate an apparatus that produced visual motion of a projected two-dimensional patterned stimulus. Single unit responses from STP were recorded and responses to visual motion, produced externally by the experimenter, were compared to the responses to visual motion (of the same pattern) produced by the monkey itself. The majority of the movement sensitive cells giving reliable responses to the pattern motion responded statistically more strongly to the experimenter-induced motion than to the motion induced by the monkey itself. The cell responses were observed not to be affected by the motion velocity and the monkey's motor activity (handle rotation without any visual stimulation) did not affect the cell's spontaneous activity. The results indicate that the response discrimination of STP cells between externally and self-induced stimulus motion is not based on form sensitivity. Moreover, the mechanism which produces the described response selectivity is not only limited to naturally occurring visual consequences of the monkey's own motor activity but is plastic and can extend to arbitrary associations between the monkey's movements and consequent visual motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8734050     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(95)00193-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

Review 1.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion.

Authors:  Aina Puce; David Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Asymmetries of the human social brain in the visual, auditory and chemical modalities.

Authors:  Alfredo Brancucci; Giuliana Lucci; Andrea Mazzatenta; Luca Tommasi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A comparison of visual responses to object- and ego-motion in the macaque superior temporal polysensory area.

Authors:  J K Hietanen; D I Perrett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays.

Authors:  Idil Kokal; Christian Keysers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sensitivity to synchronicity of biological motion in normal and amblyopic vision.

Authors:  Jennifer Y Luu; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Vestibular contribution to the planning of reach trajectories.

Authors:  Christopher J Bockisch; Thomas Haslwanter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Hebbian learning and predictive mirror neurons for actions, sensations and emotions.

Authors:  Christian Keysers; Valeria Gazzola
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data.

Authors:  Valeria Gazzola; Christian Keysers
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Differential Neural Processing during Motor Imagery of Daily Activities in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients.

Authors:  Andrea Vrana; Sabina Hotz-Boendermaker; Philipp Stämpfli; Jürgen Hänggi; Erich Seifritz; B Kim Humphreys; Michael L Meier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.