Literature DB >> 8733950

Accuracy of noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters estimated from bolus injection and steady-state infusion data.

M Looby1, M Weiss.   

Abstract

A Monte Carlo simulation study was carried out to examine the accuracy of parameters derived from curve moments. Impulse response (IR) and washout (WO) concentration-time curves, based on a triexponential model, were analyzed by numerical integration and regression analysis. Both designs were tested according to their robustness to measurement error and model misspecification. Performance of the methods was judged using the median error (ME) and the median absolute error (MAE) of 1000 simulations. The WO design provided better estimates of mean disposition residence time and worse estimates of the normalized variance of disposition residence times (CVD2) than its rival. At 20% measurement noise, the MAE of CVD2 was less than 13%. The WO design was much more robust to model misspecification. Numerical integration performed as good as, or better than, regression analysis. Both methods are very sensitive to tail-area error, meaning that special attention needs to be paid to this aspect of experimental design. This study demonstrates that it is possible to obtain good estimates of higher moment parameters in a well-designed experiment.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8733950     DOI: 10.1007/bf02353465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm        ISSN: 0090-466X


  12 in total

1.  Bias and variance of extrapolated tails for area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC).

Authors:  R D Purves
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-10

2.  Optimum numerical integration methods for estimation of area-under-the-curve (AUC) and area-under-the-moment-curve (AUMC).

Authors:  R D Purves
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1992-06

3.  The relevance of residence time theory to pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  M Weiss
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Mean time parameters in pharmacokinetics. Definition, computation and clinical implications (Part II).

Authors:  P Veng-Pedersen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Pharmacokinetics of digoxin: comparison of a two- and a three-compartment model in man.

Authors:  W G Kramer; R P Lewis; T C Cobb; W F Forester; J A Visconti; L A Wanke; H G Boxenbaum; R H Reuning
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1974-08

6.  Numerical estimation of the noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters variance and coefficient of variation of residence times.

Authors:  R D Purves
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Sampling strategies for noncompartmental estimation of mean residence time.

Authors:  D Z D'Argenio; D Katz
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1983-08

8.  Hemodynamic influences upon the variance of disposition residence time distribution of drugs.

Authors:  M Weiss
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1983-02

9.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S L Beal
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-08

10.  Pharmacokinetics of midazolam in patients recovering from cardiac surgery.

Authors:  P O Maitre; B Funk; C Crevoisier; H R Ha
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  1 in total

1.  Residence time dispersion as a general measure of drug distribution kinetics: estimation and physiological interpretation.

Authors:  Michael Weiss
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 4.200

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.