Literature DB >> 8730999

Direction repulsion in motion transparency.

E Hiris1, R Blake.   

Abstract

A series of experiments investigated perceived direction of motion and depth segregation in motion transparency displays consisting of two planes of dots moving in different directions. Direction and depth judgments were obtained from human observers viewing these "bi-directional" animation sequences with and without explicit stereoscopic depth information. We found that (1) misperception of motion direction ("direction repulsion") occurs when two spatially intermingled directions of motion are within 60 deg of each other; (2) direction repulsion is minimal at cardinal directions; (3) perception of two directions of motion always results in separate motion planes segregated in depth; and (4) stereoscopic depth information has no effect on the magnitude of direction repulsion, but it does disambiguate the depth relations between motion directions. These results are developed within the context of a two-stage model of motion transparency. On this model, motion directions are registered within units subject to inhibitory interactions that cause direction repulsion, with the outputs of these units pooled within units selective for direction and disparity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8730999     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800007227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  19 in total

1.  Motion aftereffects specific to surface depth order: beyond binocular disparity.

Authors:  Wonyeong Sohn; Adriane E Seiffert
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The hierarchy of directional interactions in visual motion processing.

Authors:  William Curran; Colin W G Clifford; Christopher P Benton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Do perceptual biases emerge early or late in visual processing? Decision-biases in motion perception.

Authors:  Elisa Zamboni; Timothy Ledgeway; Paul V McGraw; Denis Schluppeck
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Precision of working memory for visual motion sequences and transparent motion surfaces.

Authors:  Nahid Zokaei; Nikos Gorgoraptis; Bahador Bahrami; Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Visual working memory contaminates perception.

Authors:  Min-Suk Kang; Sang Wook Hong; Randolph Blake; Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

7.  Distance estimation is influenced by encoding conditions.

Authors:  Anna Oleksiak; Mirosława Mańko; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert V van den Berg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting human perceptual decisions by decoding neuronal information profiles.

Authors:  Tzvetomir Tzvetanov; Thilo Womelsdorf
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  Visual working memory items drift apart due to active, not passive, maintenance.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Yoolim Hong; Andrew B Leber; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2021-05-20

10.  Motion noise changes directional interaction between transparently moving stimuli from repulsion to attraction.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gaudio; Xin Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.