Literature DB >> 18826934

The hierarchy of directional interactions in visual motion processing.

William Curran1, Colin W G Clifford, Christopher P Benton.   

Abstract

It is well known that context influences our perception of visual motion direction. For example, spatial and temporal context manipulations can be used to induce two well-known motion illusions: direction repulsion and the direction after-effect (DAE). Both result in inaccurate perception of direction when a moving pattern is either superimposed on (direction repulsion), or presented following adaptation to (DAE), another pattern moving in a different direction. Remarkable similarities in tuning characteristics suggest that common processes underlie the two illusions. What is not clear, however, is whether the processes driving the two illusions are expressions of the same or different neural substrates. Here we report two experiments demonstrating that direction repulsion and the DAE are, in fact, expressions of different neural substrates. Our strategy was to use each of the illusions to create a distorted perceptual representation upon which the mechanisms generating the other illusion could potentially operate. We found that the processes mediating direction repulsion did indeed access the distorted perceptual representation induced by the DAE. Conversely, the DAE was unaffected by direction repulsion. Thus parallels in perceptual phenomenology do not necessarily imply common neural substrates. Our results also demonstrate that the neural processes driving the DAE occur at an earlier stage of motion processing than those underlying direction repulsion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18826934      PMCID: PMC2674350          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  26 in total

1.  Local velocity representation: evidence from motion adaptation.

Authors:  P R Schrater; E P Simoncelli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Motion repulsion is monocular.

Authors:  Alexander Grunewald
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  New binary direction aftereffect does not add up.

Authors:  William Curran; Colin W G Clifford; Christopher P Benton
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The direction aftereffect is driven by adaptation of local motion detectors.

Authors:  William Curran; Colin W G Clifford; Christopher P Benton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Direction repulsion in motion transparency.

Authors:  E Hiris; R Blake
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Perception of three-dimensional structure from motion.

Authors:  R A Andersen; D C Bradley
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Motion integration over space: interaction of the center and surround motion.

Authors:  J Kim; H R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Adaptive psychophysical procedures.

Authors:  B Treutwein
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Phenomenal coherence of moving visual patterns.

Authors:  E H Adelson; J A Movshon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  The role of perceived speed in vection: does perceived speed modulate the jitter and oscillation advantages?

Authors:  Deborah Apthorp; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.