Literature DB >> 8730858

Stationary phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

M Werner-Washburne1, E L Braun, M E Crawford, V M Peck.   

Abstract

Like other microorganisms, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to starvation by arresting growth and entering stationary phase. Because most microorganisms exist under conditions of nutrient limitation, the ability to tolerate starvation is critical for survival. Molecular analyses have identified changes in transcription, translation, and protein modification in stationary-phase cells. At the level of translation, the pattern of newly synthesized proteins in stationary-phase cells is surprisingly similar to the pattern of proteins synthesized during exponential growth. When limited for different nutrients, yeast strains may not enter stationary phase but opt for pathways such as pseudohyphal growth. If nutrient limitation continues, the end-point is likely to be a stationary-phase cell. Based on the results of recent studies, we propose a model for entry into stationary phase in which G(o) arrest is separable from acquisition of the ability to survive long periods of time without added nutrients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8730858     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Microbiol        ISSN: 0950-382X            Impact factor:   3.501


  68 in total

1.  The two Saccharomyces cerevisiae SUA7 (TFIIB) transcripts differ at the 3'-end and respond differently to stress.

Authors:  B C Hoopes; G D Bowers; M J DiVisconte
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Global control of histone modification by the anaphase-promoting complex.

Authors:  Vijay Ramaswamy; Jessica S Williams; Karen M Robinson; Richelle L Sopko; Michael C Schultz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The Ras/cAMP-dependent protein kinase signaling pathway regulates an early step of the autophagy process in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Yelena V Budovskaya; Joseph S Stephan; Fulvio Reggiori; Daniel J Klionsky; Paul K Herman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Staying alive: metabolic adaptations to quiescence.

Authors:  James R Valcourt; Johanna M S Lemons; Erin M Haley; Mina Kojima; Olukunle O Demuren; Hilary A Coller
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E-dependent translation is not essential for survival of starved yeast cells.

Authors:  I Paz; M Choder
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  The freeze-thaw stress response of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is growth phase specific and is controlled by nutritional state via the RAS-cyclic AMP signal transduction pathway.

Authors:  J I Park; C M Grant; P V Attfield; I W Dawes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 7.  A simple model system for age-dependent DNA damage and cancer.

Authors:  F Madia; C Gattazzo; P Fabrizio; V D Longo
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 5.432

8.  Starvation for different nutrients in Escherichia coli results in differential modulation of RpoS levels and stability.

Authors:  Mark J Mandel; Thomas J Silhavy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  The role of fnx1, a fission yeast multidrug resistance protein, in the transition of cells to a quiescent G0 state.

Authors:  K Dimitrov; S Sazer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  tRNAHis 5-methylcytidine levels increase in response to several growth arrest conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Melanie A Preston; Sonia D'Silva; Yoshiko Kon; Eric M Phizicky
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.